Cited by 60Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryMental Health via Writing

The language of paranoia

Thomas E. Oxman, Stanley D. Rosenberg, GARY J. TUCKER·1982·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

In order to assess which of three current models is most useful in understanding paranoia, the authors applied computer speech content analysis to 55 patients--24 of whom were in four groups expressing paranoid delusions and 31 of whom were in four groups not expressing such delusions. The results delineated a semantic or verbal profile of paranoid self-presentation. This self-presentation is more identifiable than the effects of any other patient characteristic, even if the delusion is not discussed by the patient. The strength of the statistical evidence supports the model of paranoid delusions as a separate disease rather than as a subtype of schizophrenia or as a trait that exists on a spectrum from normality to pathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.139.3.275

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Suspiciousness and paranoia symptoms may stem from the avoidance of personal exposure and negative self-image, distorting reality so as to strengthen impaired self-esteem.

    “These symptoms may stem from the avoidance of personal exposure and negative self-image, distorting reality in the process so as to strengthen impaired self-esteem (Bentall et al., 2008, Oxman et al., 1982).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oxman, T. E., Rosenberg, S. D., & TUCKER, G. J.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1982-03-01
Volume
139
Issue
3
Pages
275-282
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2417366707
Cited by
60
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
paranoia, persecutory delusions, speech content analysis, semantic profiles, schizophrenia subtypes
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Computers, Delusions, Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Paranoid Disorders, Schizophrenia, Paranoid, Schizophrenic Language, Semantics, Verbal Behavior, Neurocognitive Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review