Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Double-blind trial of imipramine in Alzheimer's disease patients with and without depression

·1989·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

The authors divided 61 subjects with primary degenerative dementia of the Alzheimer's type into a group who also met DSM-III criteria for depression (N = 28) and a group who did not (N = 33). Both groups were randomly assigned to an 8-week double-blind trial of imipramine or placebo. Scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, administered at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8, indicated significant improvement in both groups. Two measures of cognitive function yielded differing results. The results suggest that moderate depression is a treatable condition in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.146.1.45

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1989-01-01
Volume
146
Issue
1
Pages
45-49
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W6243660
Cited by
341
References
0
FWCI
19.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Double-blind trial of imipramine in Alzheimer's disease patients with and without depression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.146.1.45
The paper
Double-blind trial of imipramine in Alzheimer's disease patients with and without depression. (1989). American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.146.1.45

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.