The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychotic (delusional) major depression: should it be included as a distinct syndrome in DSM-IV?
Abstract
To review data supporting or not supporting the designation of unipolar psychotic major depression as a distinct syndrome in DSM-IV, the authors used computerized literature searches to identify reports of studies that have directly compared the characteristics, biology, familial transmission, course/outcome, and response to treatment of psychotic and nonpsychotic major depression. The review showed that statistically significant differences between the two types of depression have been found on each of these dimensions. There are greater guilt feelings and psychomotor disturbance, among other features, in psychotic depression. Studies have found significant differences between patients with psychotic and nonpsychotic depression in glucocorticoid activity, dopamine beta-hydroxylase activity, levels of dopamine and serotonin metabolites, sleep measures, and ventricle-to-brain ratios. Family studies show higher rates of bipolar disorder in first-degree relatives of probands with psychotic major depression than of probands with nonpsychotic major depression. Greater morbidity and residual impairment have also been reported in patients with psychotic major depression, and they respond more poorly to placebo and to tricyclic antidepressants. Differences between patients with psychotic and nonpsychotic major depression on many of these measures were not due to differences in severity or endogenicity. Since the data indicate that psychotic and nonpsychotic major depression can be separated, the frequency with which the diagnosis of psychotic major depression is missed and its unique course and response to treatment point to the practical importance of a separate diagnosis for this disorder. However, further studies are needed to resolve important methodological issues and to develop an optimal set of operational criteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diagnosis and definition of treatment-resistant depression
Fava, M. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00231-2 · Cited by 1,380
The Brown assessment of beliefs scale: Reliability and validity
Eisen, J. L., Phillips, K. A., Baer, L., Beer, D. A., Atala, K. D., & Rasmussen, S. A. (1998) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.155.1.102 · Cited by 705
ECT Remission Rates in Psychotic Versus Nonpsychotic Depressed Patients: A Report from CORE
Petrides, G., Fink, M., Husain, M. M., Knapp, R. G., Rush, A. J., Mueller, M., Rummans, T. A., O'Connor, K. M., Rasmussen, K. G., Bernstein, H. J., et al. (2001) · The Journal of ECT · doi:10.1097/00124509-200112000-00003 · Cited by 494
A Review of Postpartum Psychosis
Sit, D., Rothschild, A. J., & Wisner, K. L. (2006) · Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2006.15.352 · Cited by 454
Self-citationDST Studies in Psychotic Depression: A Meta-Analysis
Nelson, J. C., & Davis, J. M. (1997) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.154.11.1497 · Cited by 356
Metadata
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1992-06-01
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 733-745
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W1597915293
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychotic (delusional) major depression: should it be included as a distinct syndrome in DSM-IV? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.149.6.733
- The paper
- Psychotic (delusional) major depression: should it be included as a distinct syndrome in DSM-IV? (1992). American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.149.6.733
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.