The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of clozapine on positive and negative symptoms in outpatients with schizophrenia
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Clozapine is an atypical neuroleptic with superior efficacy in severely ill, treatment-resistant inpatients with schizophrenia. To determine if clozapine's differential efficacy generalizes to less ill, outpatients populations, the authors examined the effects of clozapine on positive and negative symptoms in outpatients with schizophrenia. METHOD: Outpatients with schizophrenia who had histories of partial response to conventional neuroleptics and who had not responded to a prospective 6-week trial of fluphenazine participated in a 10-week, double-blind, parallel-groups comparison of clozapine and haloperidol. Thirteen men and six women were given clozapine, and 15 men and five women were given haloperidol. Clinical response rates were determined and effects on primary versus secondary negative symptoms were addressed. Doses of clozapine and haloperidol at the end of the 10-week trial were 410.5 mg/day (SD = 45.8) and 24.8 mg/day (SD = 5.5), respectively. RESULTS: Clozapine was superior to haloperidol for treating positive symptoms. In addition, eight of the patients given clozapine and only one of the patients given haloperidol fulfilled clinical responder criteria. Clozapine was also superior to haloperidol for treating negative symptoms, although these effects were relatively minor. Negative symptoms were significantly affected in the subgroup of patients with nondeficit schizophrenia but not in the subgroup with deficit schizophrenia. Overall, clozapine was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine has superior efficacy for treating positive symptoms in partially responsive outpatients with chronic schizophrenia, suggesting that it has utility for a broad spectrum of patients with schizophrenia beyond the most severely ill.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
Cited by
Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia: A Double-blind Clozapine-Haloperidol Comparison
Kumra, S. (1996) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830120020005 · Cited by 410
Sams-Dodd, F., Lipska, B. K., & Weinberger, D. R. (1997) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130050349 · Cited by 346
Prenatal stress generates deficits in rat social behavior: Reversal by oxytocin
Lee, P. R., Brady, D. L., Shapiro, R. A., Dorsa, D. M., & Koenig, J. I. (2007) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.042 · Cited by 270
Clozapine: a review of clinical practice guidelines and prescribing trends
Warnez, S., & Alessi-Severini, S. (2014) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-14-102 · Cited by 234
Tauscher, J., Hussain, T., Agid, O., Verhoeff, N. P. L. G., Wilson, A. A., Houle, S., Remington, G., Zipursky, R. B., & Kapur, S. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1620 · Cited by 159
Emotional responding in deficit and non-deficit schizophrenia
Earnst, K. S., & Kring, A. M. (1999) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/s0165-1781(99)00083-9 · Cited by 124
Athanassiou, M., Dumais, A., Gnanhoue, G., Abdel-Baki, A., Jutras-Aswad, D., & Potvin, S. (2021) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/14737175.2021.1942845 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-26
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2415246766
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.