The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of induced and independent major depressive disorders in 2,945 alcoholics
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Depressive episodes among alcohol-dependent men and women are heterogeneous in causation and clinical course. This study tested three hypotheses regarding the rates and clinical characteristics of two potential subtypes of these affective states: those that appear to be substance-induced mood disorders and those that are independent major depressive episodes. METHOD: Semistructured, detailed interviews were administered to 2,945 alcohol-dependent subjects as part of the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism. With the use of a time line method for determining the type of mood disorder among probands, relatives, and comparison subjects, individuals with histories of the two types of mood disorders were compared. RESULTS: Major depressive episodes with an onset before the development of alcohol dependence or during a subsequent long abstinence period (i.e., independent depressions) were observed in 15.2% of the alcoholics, while 26.4% reported at least one substance-induced depressive episode. According to a logistic regression analysis, the subjects with independent (as compared to substance-induced) major depressive episodes were more likely to be married, Caucasian, and female, to have had experience with fewer drugs and less treatment for alcoholism, to have attempted suicide, and, on the basis of personal interviews with family members, to have a close relative with a major mood disorder. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the contention that it is possible to differentiate between what appear to be substance-induced and independent depressive episodes in alcoholics. Such differentiation might be important for establishing prognosis and optimal treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kessler, R. C., Nelson, C. B., McGonagle, K. A., Edlund, M. J., Frank, R. G., & Leaf, P. J. (1996) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1037/h0080151 · Cited by 1,378
Changes in depression among abstinent alcoholics
Brown, S. A., & Schuckit, M. A. (1988) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1988.49.412 · Cited by 412
Self-citation
Cited by
Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, S. P., Dufour, M. C., Compton, W., Pickering, R. P., & Kaplan, K. (2004) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.8.807 · Cited by 2,889
Boden, J. M., & Fergusson, D. M. (2011) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03351.x · Cited by 1,233
Spatz Widom, C., DuMont, K., & Czaja, S. J. (2007) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.1.49 · Cited by 1,059
Rehm, J., Room, R., Graham, K., Monteiro, M., Gmel, G., & Sempos, C. T. (2003) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00467.x · Cited by 995
Neurobiological similarities in depression and drug dependence: a self-medication hypothesis
Markou, A. (1998) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(97)00113-9 · Cited by 767
Metadata
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 948-957
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2252948336
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of induced and independent major depressive disorders in 2,945 alcoholics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.154.7.948
- The paper
- Comparison of induced and independent major depressive disorders in 2,945 alcoholics. (1997). American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.7.948
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.