The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Somatization in cross-cultural perspective: a World Health Organization study in primary care
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the phenomenon of somatization in different cultures by determining its frequency and correlates in primary care settings in 14 countries. METHOD: Consecutive primary care patients (N = 25,916) were screened with the 12-item General Health questionnaire, and a stratified sample (N = 5,438) was interviewed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Interviewed patients were also assessed for physical disease burden, self-rated overall health, physician-rated physical health status, number of disability days, and interviewer-rated occupational role functioning. The authors determined center-specific associations with the use of logistic regression analyses in which confounding variables were controlled. RESULTS: ICD-10 defined somatization disorder was relatively uncommon in most primary care settings. A less restrictively defined form was more common. Symptom rates were much higher in South American sites. There was a modest association with low education. Otherwise, frequency of unexplained somatic symptoms did not clearly vary according to geography or level of economic development. Somatizing patients were at elevated risk for self-reported disease burden, negative perception of their health, and comorbid depression and generalized anxiety disorder. Somatization was also commonly associated with disability. Cultures did not differ markedly in the pattern of these associated features. CONCLUSION: Somatization is a common problem in primary care across cultures and is associated with significant problems and disability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ESCOBAR, J. I., RUBIO-STIPEC, M., CANINO, G., & KARNO, M. (1989) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198903000-00003 · Cited by 380
Jr, G. (1986) · doi:10.1001/archinte.1986.00360130079012 · Cited by 237
Cited by
Demyttenaere, K., Bruffaerts, R., Lee, S., Posada-Villa, J., Kovess, V., Angermeyer, M. C., Levinson, D., de Girolamo, G., Nakane, H., Mneimneh, Z., et al. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.022 · Cited by 608
Self-citationCulture and Somatization: Clinical, Epidemiological, and Ethnographic Perspectives
Kirmayer, L. J., & Young, A. (1998) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-199807000-00006 · Cited by 521
A systematic review of the epidemiology of somatisation disorder and hypochondriasis
Creed, F., & Barsky, A. (2004) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(03)00622-6 · Cited by 421
Gureje, O., Von Korff, M., Kola, L., Demyttenaere, K., He, Y., Posada-Villa, J., Lepine, J. P., Angermeyer, M. C., Levinson, D., de Girolamo, G., et al. (2008) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.05.005 · Cited by 337
Self-citationSomatization Symptoms and Hypochondriacal Features in the General Population
Rief, W., Hessel, A., & Braehler, E. (2001) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-200107000-00012 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 989-995
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2313498130
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Somatization in cross-cultural perspective: a World Health Organization study in primary care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.154.7.989
- The paper
- Somatization in cross-cultural perspective: a World Health Organization study in primary care. (1997). American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.7.989
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.