The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-Term Outcome of Lithium Prophylaxis in Bipolar Disorder: A 5-Year Prospective Study of 402 Patients at a Lithium Clinic
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this prospective study, information was collected on all bipolar I patients who started lithium prophylaxis at a lithium clinic during more than 15 years. METHOD: Patients were evaluated bimonthly with standardized instruments for as long as they took lithium. Treatment surveillance conformed to internationally accepted guidelines. Five years after starting prophylaxis, each patient was contacted for a follow-up interview. RESULTS: Of the 402 enrolled patients, 27.9% were no longer taking lithium at follow-up; 38.1% were taking lithium and had had at least one recurrence of the disorder; and 23.4% were taking lithium and had had no recurrence. Among patients still taking lithium whose plasma lithium levels had been below 0.5 mmol/liter on no more than 10% of checks, 88.0% had at least a 50% reduction in mean annual time spent in the hospital compared to a reference pretreatment period, and 43.0% had had no recurrence. Patients not taking lithium at follow-up had a poorer outcome than those taking lithium, but patients no longer taking any psychotropic drug did not differ from those taking lithium. Patients no longer taking lithium had had a higher frequency of psychotic features in the index episode than those still taking lithium. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of lithium prophylaxis on the course of bipolar disorder is severely limited by the high dropout rate. In bipolar patients taking lithium regularly for several years, a drastic reduction of time spent in the hospital is almost the rule; these patients represent a self-selected population in which at least one group at high risk of poor outcome is under-represented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clinical Factors in Lithium Carbonate Prophylaxis Failure
Dunner, D. L. (1974) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760080077013 · Cited by 514
Prien, R. F. (1973) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1973.04200030104017 · Cited by 448
(1992) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.149.6.795 · Cited by 228
Self-citation
Cited by
Geddes, J. R., Burgess, S., Hawton, K., Jamison, K., & Goodwin, G. M. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.2.217 · Cited by 661
Perry, A., Tarrier, N., Morriss, R., McCarthy, E., & Limb, K. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7177.149 · Cited by 586
Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Bipolar Disorder (Revision)
Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Bowden, C. L., Gitlin, M. J., Keck, P. E., Perlis, R. H., Suppes, T., Thase, M. E., & Wagner, K. D. (2003) · Focus · doi:10.1176/foc.1.1.64 · Cited by 585
Teixeira, J. M. A., Fisk, N. M., & Glover, V. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7177.153 · Cited by 526
Manchia, M., Adli, M., Akula, N., Ardau, R., Aubry, J.-M., Backlund, L., Banzato, C. E., Baune, B. T., Bellivier, F., Bengesser, S., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065636 · Cited by 417
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Maj, M., Pirozzi, R., Magliano, L., & Bartoli, L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-35
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2162376922
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Outcome of Lithium Prophylaxis in Bipolar Disorder: A 5-Year Prospective Study of 402 Patients at a Lithium Clinic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.155.1.30
- The paper
- Maj, M., Pirozzi, R., Magliano, L., & Bartoli, L. (1998). Long-Term Outcome of Lithium Prophylaxis in Bipolar Disorder: A 5-Year Prospective Study of 402 Patients at a Lithium Clinic. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.155.1.30
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.