The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sympathoadrenal Hyperactivity and the Etiology of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The author's goal was to develop a pathophysiological model for neuroleptic malignant syndrome with greater explanatory power than the alternative hypotheses of hypothalamic dopamine antagonism (elevated set point) and direct myotoxicity (malignant hyperthermia variant). METHOD: Published clinical findings on neuroleptic malignant syndrome were integrated with data from human and animal studies of muscle physiology, thermoregulation, and autonomic nervous system function. RESULTS: The data show that the sympathetic nervous system's latent capacity for autonomous activity is expressed when tonic inhibitory inputs from higher central nervous system centers are disrupted. These tonic inhibitory inputs are relayed to preganglionic sympathetic neurons by way of dopaminergic hypothalamospinal tracts. The sympathetic nervous system mediates hypothalamic coordination of thermoregulatory activity and is a primary regulator of muscle tone and thermogenesis, augmenting both of these when stimulated. In addition, the sympathetic nervous system modulates all of the other end-organs that function abnormally in neuroleptic malignant syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial evidence to support the hypothesis that dysregulated sympathetic nervous system hyperactivity is responsible for most, if not all, features of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. A predisposition to more extreme sympathetic nervous system activation and/or dysfunction in response to emotional or psychological stress may constitute a trait vulnerability for neuroleptic malignant syndrome, which, when coupled with state variables such as acute psychic distress or dopamine receptor antagonism, produces the clinical syndrome of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. This hypothesis provides a more comprehensive explanation for existing clinical data than do the current alternatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Noradrenergic and peptidergic innervation of lymphoid tissue
Felten, D. L., Felten, S. Y., Carlson, S. L., Olschowka, J. A., & Livnat, S. (1985) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.135.2.755 · Cited by 1,025 · cited 1×
“high concentrations they are inhibitory (158).”
Cited by
Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
Strawn, J. R., Keck, P. E., & Caroff, S. N. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2007.164.6.870 · Cited by 579
Catatonia: A Clinician's Guide to Diagnosis and Treatment
Fink, M., & Taylor, M. A. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511543777 · Cited by 269
"Scared Stiff": Catatonia as an Evolutionary-Based Fear Response.
Moskowitz, A. K. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.984 · Cited by 207
Movement disorders induced by antipsychotic drugs: implications of the CATIE schizophrenia trial.
Caroff, S. N., Hurford, I., Lybrand, J., & Campbell, E. C. (2011) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2010.10.002 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Gurrera, R. J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1999-02-01
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-180
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W1921143194
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sympathoadrenal Hyperactivity and the Etiology of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.156.2.169
- The paper
- Gurrera, R. J. (1999). Sympathoadrenal Hyperactivity and the Etiology of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.156.2.169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.