Cited by 255Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSchizophrenia research and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Smoking Cessation Intervention Among People With a Psychotic Disorder

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite extremely high rates of smoking among individuals with psychotic disorders and the associated financial and health costs, few studies have investigated the efficacy of smoking cessation interventions among this group. The purpose of this study was to compare an integrated psychological and nicotine replacement therapy intervention for people with a psychotic disorder with routine care alone. METHOD: The authors recruited 298 regular smokers with a psychotic disorder residing in the community and randomly assigned them to a routine care comparison condition (N=151) or an eight-session, individually administered smoking cessation intervention (N=147), which consisted of nicotine replacement therapy, motivational interviewing, and cognitive behavior therapy. Outcome variables included continuous and point-prevalence abstinence rates, smoking reduction status, and changes in symptoms and functioning. RESULTS: While there were no overall differences between the treatment group and comparison group in abstinence rates, a significantly higher proportion of smokers who completed all treatment sessions stopped smoking at each of the follow-up occasions (point-prevalence rates: 3 months, 30.0% versus 6.0%; 6 months, 18.6% versus 4.0%; and 12 months, 18.6% versus 6.6%). Smokers who completed all treatment sessions were also more likely to have achieved continuous abstinence at 3 months (21.4% versus 4.0%). There was a strong dose-response relationship between treatment session attendance and smoking reduction status, with one-half of those who completed the intervention program achieving a 50% or greater reduction in daily cigarette consumption across the follow-ups, relative to less than one-fifth of the comparison subjects. There was no evidence of any associated deterioration in symptoms or functioning. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the utility of a nicotine replacement therapy plus motivational interviewing/cognitive behavior therapy smoking cessation intervention among individuals with a psychotic disorder. Further development of more efficacious interventions is required for those who do not respond to existing interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1934

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 34 references

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1080/09595230120058623 · DOI
  2. Australia, 2000, The SANE Smokefree Guide for Consumers
  3. Australia, 2000, The SANE Smokefree Guide for Supporters
  4. Ventura J, 1993, Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 3, 227
  5. Beck AT, 1988, Steer RA
  6. Spielberger CD, 1983, Calif
  7. US Department of Health and Human Services, 2000, Md
  8. Work Group on Nicotine Dependence, 1996, Am J Psychiatry, 153, S1
  9. Potvin S, 2003, Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 18, 121

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 255

Metadata

Authors
Baker, A., Richmond, R., Haile, M., Lewin, T. J., Carr, V. J., Taylor, R. L., Jansons, S., & Wilhelm, K.
Affiliations
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2006-11
Volume
163
Issue
11
Pages
1934-1942
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2171976686
Cited by
255
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 27
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • University of New South Wales
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (141708)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
smoking cessation, psychosis, nicotine replacement therapy, motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy, abstinence rates, dose-response relationship, treatment attendance
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Counseling, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Motivation, Nicotine, Psychotic Disorders, Smoking, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review