Cited by 318Schizophrenia research and treatmentDisability Education and EmploymentEmployment and Welfare Studies

Cognitive Training for Supported Employment: 2-3 Year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial

McGurk, Susan R., Mueser, Kim T., Feldman,, Karin, Wolfe,, Rosemarie, Pascaris,, Alysia·2007·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To address cognitive impairments that limit the effectiveness of supported employment services for patients with schizophrenia, a cognitive training program, the Thinking Skills for Work Program, was developed and integrated into supported employment services. METHOD: Patients with severe mental illness (N=44) and prior histories of job failures who were enrolled in supported employment programs at two sites in New York City were randomly assigned to receive either supported employment alone or supported employment with cognitive training. Measures at baseline and 3 months included a brief cognitive and symptom assessment. Work outcomes were tracked for 2-3 years. RESULTS: Patients in the supported employment with cognitive training program demonstrated significantly greater improvements at 3 months in cognitive functioning, depression, and autistic preoccupation. Over 2-3 years, patients in the supported employment with cognitive training program were more likely to work, held more jobs, worked more weeks, worked more hours, and earned more wages than patients in the program offering supported employment alone. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the feasibility of integrating cognitive rehabilitation into supported employment programs and suggest that more research is warranted to evaluate the effects of the Thinking Skills for Work Program.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.3.437

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 318

Authors
McGurk, S. R., Mueser, K. T., Feldman, Wolfe, & Pascaris
Affiliations
Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2007-03
Volume
164
Issue
3
Pages
437-441
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2163422576
Cited by
318
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 24
FWCI
13.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
cognitive training, supported employment, schizophrenia, severe mental illness, cognitive rehabilitation, employment effects, cognitive impairment, depression, job retention, wages
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition Disorders, Employment, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, New York City, Rehabilitation Centers, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Program Evaluation, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Employment, Supported, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review