Cognitive Training for Supported Employment: 2-3 Year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To address cognitive impairments that limit the effectiveness of supported employment services for patients with schizophrenia, a cognitive training program, the Thinking Skills for Work Program, was developed and integrated into supported employment services. METHOD: Patients with severe mental illness (N=44) and prior histories of job failures who were enrolled in supported employment programs at two sites in New York City were randomly assigned to receive either supported employment alone or supported employment with cognitive training. Measures at baseline and 3 months included a brief cognitive and symptom assessment. Work outcomes were tracked for 2-3 years. RESULTS: Patients in the supported employment with cognitive training program demonstrated significantly greater improvements at 3 months in cognitive functioning, depression, and autistic preoccupation. Over 2-3 years, patients in the supported employment with cognitive training program were more likely to work, held more jobs, worked more weeks, worked more hours, and earned more wages than patients in the program offering supported employment alone. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the feasibility of integrating cognitive rehabilitation into supported employment programs and suggest that more research is warranted to evaluate the effects of the Thinking Skills for Work Program.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study of IPS enhancement through cognitive remediation identified enhanced IPS (69.6%) over standard IPS (14.3%), but low adherence to IPS fidelity was reported in both arms.
“A study of IPS enhancement through cognitive remediation [67] identified enhanced IPS (69.6%) over standard IPS (14.3%), but, low adherence to IPS fidelity was reported in both arms of the study, which may explain the poor standard IPS outcome.”
From An enhanced individual placement and support (iPS) intervention based on the model of human occupation (MOHO); a prospective cohort study (2020) · cites this paper as [67]
A different study found that augmenting SE with cognitive training in subjects with schizophrenia significantly increased the outcome of subjects (30% vs. 9%).
“They found that the added training significantly increased the outcome of subjects (30% vs. 9%).”
From Supported employment: Meta-analysis and review of randomized controlled trials of individual placement and support (2019) · cites this paper as [56]
The difference in employment for PTSD groups seemed to be most evident in the SE treatment group.
“The difference seemed to be most evident in the SE treatment group.”
From Supported employment: Meta-analysis and review of randomized controlled trials of individual placement and support (2019) · cites this paper as [56]
One study found that PTSD groups were less likely to be employed in the SE and other conditions.
“One study looked at moderating effect of PTSD on outcomes for SE [56] and found that PTSD groups were less likely to be employed in the SE and other conditions.”
From Supported employment: Meta-analysis and review of randomized controlled trials of individual placement and support (2019) · cites this paper as [56]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 318
- Authors
- McGurk, S. R., Mueser, K. T., Feldman, Wolfe, & Pascaris
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 437-441
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2163422576
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- cognitive training, supported employment, schizophrenia, severe mental illness, cognitive rehabilitation, employment effects, cognitive impairment, depression, job retention, wages
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cognition Disorders, Employment, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, New York City, Rehabilitation Centers, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Program Evaluation, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Employment, Supported, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review