Cited by 165Electroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Efficacy of Continuation ECT and Antidepressant Drugs Compared to Long-Term Antidepressants Alone in Depressed Patients

Gagné, Gerard G., Furman, Martin J., Carpenter, Linda L., Price, Lawrence H.·2000·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of continuation ECT in depression. METHOD: The authors used retrospective chart review to identify 29 patients who received continuation ECT plus long-term antidepressant treatment after a positive response to acute treatment with ECT for a depressive episode (continuation ECT group). A retrospective case-controlled approach was used to ascertain a matching group of 29 patients who received long-term antidepressant treatment alone after responding positively to acute ECT (antidepressant-alone group). All 58 patients (46 with unipolar depression, 12 with bipolar disorder) had been chronically depressed before receiving acute ECT. Data from medical records were analyzed by using survival analysis and proportional hazards regression to determine outcome and risk factors. RESULTS: The mean duration of the follow-up period for all patients was 3.9 years (5.4 years for the continuation ECT patients and 2.4 years for the antidepressant-alone patients). Outcome was significantly better in the continuation ECT group. The cumulative probability of surviving without relapse or recurrence at 2 years was 93% for continuation ECT patients and 52% for antidepressant-alone patients. At 5 years, survival declined to 73% for continuation ECT patients, but fell to 18% for antidepressant-alone patients. Mean survival times were 6.9 years for the continuation ECT patients and 2.7 years for the antidepressant-alone patients. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide strong support for the efficacy of continuation ECT plus long-term antidepressant treatment in preventing relapse and recurrence in chronically depressed patients who have responded to acute treatment with ECT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.12.1960

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gagné, G. G., Furman, M. J., Carpenter, L. L., & Price, L. H.
Affiliations
Butler Hospital (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2000-12-01
Volume
157
Issue
12
Pages
1960-1965
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2120080550
Cited by
165
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
long-term antidepressant treatment, major depressive disorder, bipolar depression, relapse prevention, recurrence prevention, chronic depression, maintenance therapy, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Bipolar Disorder, Chronic Disease, Combined Modality Therapy, Depressive Disorder, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review