Efficacy of Continuation ECT and Antidepressant Drugs Compared to Long-Term Antidepressants Alone in Depressed Patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of continuation ECT in depression. METHOD: The authors used retrospective chart review to identify 29 patients who received continuation ECT plus long-term antidepressant treatment after a positive response to acute treatment with ECT for a depressive episode (continuation ECT group). A retrospective case-controlled approach was used to ascertain a matching group of 29 patients who received long-term antidepressant treatment alone after responding positively to acute ECT (antidepressant-alone group). All 58 patients (46 with unipolar depression, 12 with bipolar disorder) had been chronically depressed before receiving acute ECT. Data from medical records were analyzed by using survival analysis and proportional hazards regression to determine outcome and risk factors. RESULTS: The mean duration of the follow-up period for all patients was 3.9 years (5.4 years for the continuation ECT patients and 2.4 years for the antidepressant-alone patients). Outcome was significantly better in the continuation ECT group. The cumulative probability of surviving without relapse or recurrence at 2 years was 93% for continuation ECT patients and 52% for antidepressant-alone patients. At 5 years, survival declined to 73% for continuation ECT patients, but fell to 18% for antidepressant-alone patients. Mean survival times were 6.9 years for the continuation ECT patients and 2.7 years for the antidepressant-alone patients. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide strong support for the efficacy of continuation ECT plus long-term antidepressant treatment in preventing relapse and recurrence in chronically depressed patients who have responded to acute treatment with ECT.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the single non-placebo long-term comparison, adding continued ECT to antidepressant treatment yielded a significantly lower recurrence rate than antidepressant treatment alone (27.6% vs 82.8%).
“the single exception involved a small, 5.4-year comparison of antidepressant treatment alone versus with continued ECT, in which the addition of ECT yielded a significantly lower recurrence rate (27.6% vs. 82.8%; Gagne et al., 2000).”
From Prevention of Relapse and Recurrence in Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Controlled Trials (2016) · cites this paper as Gagne et al., 2000
Findings of two identified studies favored ECT added or compared with medicinal treatments.
“Their findings favored ECT added or compared with medicinal treatments (Gagne et al., 2000; Kellner et al., 2006).”
From Prevention of Relapse and Recurrence in Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Controlled Trials (2016) · cites this paper as Gagne et al., 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Malhi, G. S., Bassett, D., Boyce, P., Bryant, R., Fitzgerald, P. B., Fritz, K., Hopwood, M., Lyndon, B., Mulder, R., Murray, G., et al. (2015) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867415617657 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
Cleare, A., Pariante, C., Young, A., Anderson, I., Christmas, D., Cowen, P., Dickens, C., Ferrier, I., Geddes, J., Gilbody, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881115581093 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
Sim, K., Lau, W. K., Sim, J., Sum, M. Y., & Baldessarini, R. J. (2016) · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyv076 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Effective Use of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Late-Life Depression
Flint, A. J., & Gagnon, N. (2002) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674370204700804 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Efficacy of Maintenance Electroconvulsive Therapy in Recurrent Depression: A Naturalistic Study
Gupta, S., Tobiansky, R., Bassett, P., & Warner, J. (2008) · The Journal of ECT · doi:10.1097/yct.0b013e3181608bf2 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Relapse following electroconvulsive therapy
Moksnes, K. M. (2011) · Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening · doi:10.4045/tidsskr.10.1349 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gagné, G. G., Furman, M. J., Carpenter, L. L., & Price, L. H.
- Affiliations
- Butler Hospital (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1960-1965
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2120080550
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Keywords
- long-term antidepressant treatment, major depressive disorder, bipolar depression, relapse prevention, recurrence prevention, chronic depression, maintenance therapy, treatment outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Bipolar Disorder, Chronic Disease, Combined Modality Therapy, Depressive Disorder, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Secondary Prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review