Cited by 46Electroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Efficacy of Maintenance Electroconvulsive Therapy in Recurrent Depression: A Naturalistic Study

Gupta, Susham, Tobiansky, Rob, Bassett, Paul, Warner, James·2008·The Journal of ECT

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The use of maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (mECT) in contemporary psychiatric practice is controversial. In the United Kingdom, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence has recommended that mECT should not be used, although evidence underpinning this decision is lacking. Undertaking a randomized evaluation of this treatment would now be very difficult in the United Kingdom. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of mECT in reducing recurrence in depression. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of 19 patients who had responded positively to an index and continuation course of ECT and then proceeded to receive mECT. We compared the number of hospital admissions and duration of hospital stay over 3 time periods: 2 years before ECT, during mECT, and up to 4 years after cessation of mECT. To account for secular trends in service use, we also compared the admission rates of this group with a matched sample who received successful index ECT followed by other maintenance therapies (comparison group). RESULTS: Participants received an average of 37 applications of mECT over a median period of 26 months. Inpatient hospital stay and rate of admissions to an acute psychiatric unit fell significantly during the period of mECT compared with the rates before the initiation of mECT. This reduction in bed use was maintained after termination of mECT. No reduction of service use was observed in the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that mECT may have a role in reducing the rate and duration of hospital stay of patients with major depressive disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yct.0b013e3181608bf2

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, S., Tobiansky, R., Bassett, P., & Warner, J.
Affiliations
Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Gupta, Susham
  • Warner, James
Venue
The Journal of ECT
Published
2008-09
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
191-194
ISSN
1095-0680 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058995638
Cited by
46
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Ect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
maintenance electroconvulsive therapy, recurrent depression, major depressive disorder, depression recurrence, hospitalization, length of hospital stay, psychiatric inpatient care, NICE guidelines, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Clinical Protocols, Depression, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Hospitalization, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Retreatment, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review