Cited by 61Treatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Brain Kinetics of Paroxetine and Fluoxetine on the Third Day of Placebo Substitution: A Fluorine MRS Study

Henry, Michael E., Moore, Constance M., Kaufman, Marc J., Michelson, David, Schmidt, Mark E., Stoddard, Eve, Vuckevic, Alexander J., Berreira, Paul J. +2 more·2000·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study tested whether a relationship exists between concentration and response following discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. METHOD: Eight patients with remitted major depression who were taking 20 mg/day of either fluoxetine or paroxetine underwent placebo substitution for 3 days. Serum drug and brain fluorine levels were obtained before and after placebo substitution. RESULTS: With placebo substitution, a mean of 88% (SD=13%) of brain fluorine signal from fluoxetine (plus fluorinated metabolites) remained, compared with a mean of 38% (SD=17%) of the brain fluorine signal from paroxetine (plus fluorinated metabolites). Among patients taking paroxetine, adverse events during placebo substitution correlated highly with steady-state brain drug levels. CONCLUSIONS: The correlation of clinical effects with brain drug levels in the paroxetine group suggests that relationships between drug response and brain drug concentrations merit further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.9.1506

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The appearance of SSRI withdrawal effects correlates with percentage reductions in plasma concentration.

    “As with withdrawal from other medications, the appearance of these withdrawal effects correlate with percentage reductions in plasma concentration 57 .”

    From Tapering of SSRI treatment to mitigate withdrawal symptoms (2019) · cites this paper as [57]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henry, M. E., Moore, C. M., Kaufman, M. J., Michelson, D., Schmidt, M. E., Stoddard, E., Vuckevic, A. J., Berreira, P. J., Cohen, B. M., & Renshaw, P. F.
Affiliations
  • McLean Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2000-09-01
Volume
157
Issue
9
Pages
1506-1508
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2061815699
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-09448, R01DA009448)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
paroxetine, fluoxetine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, brain drug levels, drug response, adverse drug reactions, drug metabolites
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fluorine, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Placebos, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Paroxetine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review