Mental disorder in elderly suicides: a case–control study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The authors' goal was to study the importance of different psychiatric disorders in relation to suicide in individuals 65 years old or older. METHOD: The psychological autopsy approach was used to study 85 cases of suicide among subjects who were 65 years old or older; 153 living comparison subjects from the same age group who were randomly selected from the tax register were interviewed face-to-face. Retrospective axis I diagnoses were made according to DSM-IV on the basis of interview data and medical records. RESULTS: Ninety-seven percent of the suicide victims fulfilled criteria for at least one DSM-IV axis I diagnosis, compared with 18% of the living comparison subjects. Recurrent major depressive disorder was a very strong risk factor for suicide, as was substance use disorder. An elevated risk was also associated with minor depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, psychotic disorder, single-episode major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Comorbid axis I disorders were observed in 15 (38%) of the 39 elderly subjects with major depressive disorder who had committed suicide. CONCLUSIONS: Although recurrent major depressive disorder was the mental disorder most strongly associated with suicide, the findings of this study suggest that elderly individuals who commit suicide represent a heterogeneous group with regard to mental disorders, implying a need for differentiated prevention strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psychological autopsy case-control studies provide remarkably consistent findings.
“a variety of investigators have applied it in case control studies that provide remarkably consistent findings (7-21).”
From Suicide in older adults (2011) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 304
- Authors
- Wærn, M., Runeson, B. S., Allebeck, P., Beskow, J., Rubenowitz, E., Skoog, I., & Wilhelmsson, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 450-455
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2128684382
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 20.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- elderly suicide, mental illness, recurrent major depressive disorder, substance use disorders, minor depressive disorder, dysthymia, psychosis, anxiety disorders, comorbidities, suicide risk factors, suicide prevention, psychological autopsy
- MeSH terms
- Suicide Prevention, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Retrospective Studies, Suicide, Sweden, Comorbidity, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review