The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Obstetric Complications and Schizophrenia: Historical and Meta-Analytic Review
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews the literature on obstetric complications as a risk factor for schizophrenia. The authors trace the evolution of this literature through different methods and carry out a quantitative review of the results from prospective, population-based studies. METHOD: Relevant papers were identified by a MEDLINE search, by examination of reference lists of published papers, and through personal contact with researchers in the field. Studies were grouped in chronological order according to common themes or methods. Meta-analytic techniques were used to summarize the findings of prospective population-based studies. RESULTS: The meta-analytic synthesis of the prospective population-based studies revealed that three groups of complications were significantly associated with schizophrenia: 1) complications of pregnancy (bleeding, diabetes, rhesus incompatibility, preeclampsia); 2) abnormal fetal growth and development: (low birthweight, congenital malformations, reduced head circumference), and 3) complications of delivery (uterine atony, asphyxia, emergency Cesarean section). Pooled estimates of effect sizes were generally less than 2. CONCLUSIONS: Current methods of investigating the relationship between obstetric complications and schizophrenia are reaching the limit of their usefulness. Lack of statistical power to measure small and interactive effects and lack of detailed information about the prenatal period are major problems with current approaches. A combination of disciplines and approaches will be needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these small but important associations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & Phillips, A. N. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1533 · Cited by 2,415
Is schizophrenia a neurodevelopmental disorder?
Murray, R. M., & Lewis, S. W. (1987) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.295.6600.681 · Cited by 889
Self-citationChoosing a future for epidemiology: II. From black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology.
Susser, M., & Susser, E. (1996) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.86.5.674 · Cited by 790
Emerging principles of altered neural circuitry in schizophrenia
Benes, F. (2000) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00041-7 · Cited by 513
Premorbid Social Functioning in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: Similarities and Differences
Cannon, M., Jones, P., Gilvarry, C., Rifkin, L., McKenzie, K., Foerster, A., & Murray, R. M. (1997) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.154.11.1544 · Cited by 345
Self-citationFoerster, A., Lewis, S. W., Owen, M. J., & Murray, R. M. (1991) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/0920-9964(91)90049-w · Cited by 95
Self-citation
Cited by
The Dopamine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia: Version III--The Final Common Pathway
Howes, O. D., & Kapur, S. (2009) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp006 · Cited by 2,693
Schizophrenia as a Complex Trait: Evidence From a Meta-analysis of Twin Studies
Sullivan, P. F., Kendler, K. S., & Neale, M. C. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.12.1187 · Cited by 2,356
van Os, J., & Kapur, S. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60995-8 · Cited by 1,971
Insel, T. R. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09552 · Cited by 1,783
The environment and schizophrenia
van Os, J., Kenis, G., & Rutten, B. P. F. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09563 · Cited by 1,572
Metadata
- Authors
- Cannon, M., Jones, P. B., & Murray, R. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1080-1092
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2127054925
- Cited by
- 1,137
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 25.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Obstetric Complications and Schizophrenia: Historical and Meta-Analytic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.7.1080
- The paper
- Cannon, M., Jones, P. B., & Murray, R. M. (2002). Obstetric Complications and Schizophrenia: Historical and Meta-Analytic Review. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.7.1080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.