The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Suicide Rates Among Physicians: A Quantitative and Gender Assessment (Meta-Analysis)
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Physicians' suicide rates have repeatedly been reported to be higher than those of the general population or other academics, but uncertainty remains. In this study, physicians' suicide rate ratios were estimated with a meta-analysis and systematic quality assessment of recent studies. METHOD: Studies of physicians' suicide rates were located in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, AARP Ageline, and the EBM Reviews: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews with the terms "physicians," "doctors," "suicide," and "mortality." Studies were included if they were published in or after 1960 and gave estimates of age-standardized suicide rates of physicians and their reference population or reported extractable data on physicians' suicide; 25 studies met the criteria. Reviewers extracted data and scored each study for quality. The studies were tested for heterogeneity and publication bias and were stratified by publication year, follow-up, and study quality. Effect sizes were pooled by using fixed-effects (women) and random-effects (men) models. RESULTS: The aggregate suicide rate ratio for male physicians, compared to the general population, was 1.41, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.21-1.65. For female physicians the ratio was 2.27 (95% CI=1.90-2.73). Visual inspection of funnel plots from tests of publication bias revealed randomness for men but some indication of bias for women, with a relative, nonsignificant lack of studies in the lower right quadrant. CONCLUSIONS: Studies on physicians' suicide collectively show modestly (men) to highly (women) elevated suicide rate ratios. Larger studies should help clarify whether female physicians' suicide rate is truly elevated or can be explained by publication bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis
Sterne, J. A. C., & Egger, M. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00377-8 · Cited by 3,779
A Systematic Review on Gender-Specific Suicide Mortality in Medical Doctors
Lindeman, S., Läärä, E., Hakko, H., & Lönnqvist, J. (1996) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.168.3.274 · Cited by 319 · cited 3×
“Characteristics of Studies Meeting Criteria for Meta-Analysis of Physicians’ Suicide Rates Study Location or Cohort and Time Period Under Observation Source of Information Linhardt et al., 1963 (14) Denmark, 1935–1959 National Health Service’s Register Dean, 1969 (15) South Africa, whites only, 1960–1966 South African…”
Background
Cited by
Hawton, K., & van Heeringen, K. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60372-x · Cited by 1,671
Burnout and Suicidal Ideation among U.S. Medical Students
Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., Massie, F. S., Power, D. V., Eacker, A., Harper, W., Durning, S., Moutier, C., Szydlo, D. W., Novotny, P. J., et al. (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-5-200809020-00008 · Cited by 1,532
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
Song, F., Parekh, Hooper, L., Loke, Y., Ryder, J., Sutton, A., Hing, C., Kwok, C., Pang, C., & Harvey, I. (2010) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta14080 · Cited by 1,039
Factors related to physician burnout and its consequences: a review
Patel, R. S., Bachu, R., Adikey, A., Malik, M., & Shah, M. (2018) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs8110098 · Cited by 896
“[29,30] Suicide rate in female physicians is 2.”
BackgroundPrevalence of depression amongst medical students: A meta-analysis
Puthran, R., Zhang, M. W. B., Tam, W. W., & Ho, R. C. (2016) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12962 · Cited by 855
Metadata
- Authors
- Schernhammer, E. S., & Colditz, G. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2004-12-01
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2295-2302
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2097612461
- Cited by
- 876
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Suicide Rates Among Physicians: A Quantitative and Gender Assessment (Meta-Analysis). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2295
- The paper
- Schernhammer, E. S., & Colditz, G. A. (2004). Suicide Rates Among Physicians: A Quantitative and Gender Assessment (Meta-Analysis). American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2295
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.