Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 330

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of Four Novel Compounds for the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder

Meltzer, Herbert Y., Arvanitis, Lisa, Bauer, Deborah, Rein, Werner, Meta-Trial Study Group·2004·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Four studies using identical protocols evaluated the safety and efficacy of four novel, evidence-based targets for antipsychotic agents: a neurokinin (NK(3)) antagonist (SR142801), a serotonin 2A/2C (5-HT(2A/2C)) antagonist (SR46349B), a central cannabinoid (CB(1)) antagonist (SR141716), and a neurotensin (NTS(1)) antagonist (SR48692). METHOD: Adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (N=481) were randomly assigned in a 3:1:1 ratio to receive fixed doses of investigational drug, placebo, or haloperidol for 6 weeks. Primary efficacy variables included changes from baseline in total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, severity of illness score on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and total score and psychosis cluster score on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). RESULTS: Significantly greater improvement in all primary efficacy variables was seen in the group receiving haloperidol than in the group receiving placebo at 6 weeks (endpoint analyses), indicating the validity of the study. The group receiving the NK(3) antagonist showed significantly greater improvement over baseline than the group receiving placebo as measured by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score, CGI severity of illness score, and BPRS psychosis cluster score. Reductions in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total and negative scores in the group receiving the 5-HT(2A/2C) antagonist were significantly larger than those in the group receiving placebo. The improvements in psychopathology produced by the NK(3) and 5-HT(2A/2C) antagonists were smaller than those produced by haloperidol, although the response to the NK(3) antagonist was positively correlated with plasma levels. The groups receiving the CB(1) and NTS(1) antagonists did not differ from the group receiving placebo on any outcome measure. All investigational drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The novel design used in this study permitted the use of a smaller number of patients receiving placebo to test the efficacy of the four novel compounds. The NK(3) and 5-HT(2A/2C) antagonists showed evidence of efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Study limitations preclude a definitive conclusion on the efficacy of CB(1) and NTS(1) antagonists in the treatment of schizophrenia. Further study of these two promising nondopaminergic mechanisms to treat schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder appears indicated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.6.975

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 330

Metadata

Authors
Meltzer, H. Y., Arvanitis, L., Bauer, D., Rein, W., & Meta-Trial Study Group
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
161
Issue
6
Pages
975-984
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2106156723
Cited by
330
References
2
FWCI
15.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of Four Novel Compounds for the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.6.975
The paper
Meltzer, H. Y., Arvanitis, L., Bauer, D., Rein, W., & Meta-Trial Study Group. (2004). Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of Four Novel Compounds for the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.6.975

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.