Cited by 112Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Manualized Supportive-Expressive Psychotherapy Versus Nonmanualized Community-Delivered Psychodynamic Therapy for Patients With Personality Disorders: Bridging Efficacy and Effectiveness

Vinnars, Bo, Barber, Jacques P., Norén, Kristina, Gallop, Robert, Weinryb, Robert M.·2005·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Time-limited manualized dynamic psychotherapy was compared with community-delivered psychodynamic therapy for outpatients with personality disorders. Method In a stratified randomized clinical trial, 156 patients with any personality disorder diagnosis were randomly assigned either to 40 sessions of supportive-expressive psychotherapy (N=80) or to community-delivered psychodynamic therapy (N=76). Assessments were made at intake and 1 and 2 years after intake. Patients were recruited consecutively from two community mental health centers (CMHCs), assessed with the Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders, and included if they had a diagnosis of any DSM-IV personality disorder. The outcome measures included the presence of a personality disorder diagnosis, personality disorder severity index, level of psychiatric symptoms (SCL-90), Global Assessment of Functioning Scale score, and number of therapy sessions. General mixed-model analysis of variance was used to assess group and time effects. Results In both treatment conditions, the global level of functioning improved while there were decreases in the prevalence of patients fulfilling criteria for a personality disorder diagnosis, personality disorder severity, and psychiatric symptoms. There was no difference in effect between treatments. During the follow-up period, patients who received supportive-expressive psychotherapy made significantly fewer visits to the CMHCs than the patients w…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1933

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 32 · Cited by 112

Authors
Vinnars, B., Barber, J. P., Norén, K., Gallop, R., & Weinryb, R. M.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2005-10-01
Volume
162
Issue
10
Pages
1933-1940
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2115658723
Cited by
112
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 61410, MH 49902, MH 45178, R01MH061410, R01MH049902)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
personality disorders, psychodynamic psychotherapy, manualized psychotherapy, treatment efficacy, treatment effectiveness, community mental health centers, outpatients, psychiatric symptoms, Global Assessment of Functioning
MeSH terms
Adult, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Manuals as Topic, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychoanalytic Therapy, Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy, Brief, Severity of Illness Index, Comorbidity, Treatment Outcome, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review