CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 829Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with eating disorders: a two-site trial with 60-week follow-up.

Open access
Fairburn, Christopher G., Cooper, Zafra, Doll, Helen A., O’Connor, Marianne E., Bohn, Kristin, Hawker, Deborah M., Wales, Jackie A., Palmer, Robert L.·2009·American Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040608PMC PMC3035831
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare two cognitive-behavioral treatments for outpatients with eating disorders, one focusing solely on eating disorder features and the other a more complex treatment that also addresses mood intolerance, clinical perfectionism, low self-esteem, or interpersonal difficulties. METHOD: A total of 154 patients who had a DSM-IV eating disorder but were not markedly underweight (body mass index over 17.5), were enrolled in a two-site randomized controlled trial involving 20 weeks of treatment and a 60-week closed period of follow-up. The control condition was an 8-week waiting list period preceding treatment. Outcomes were measured by independent assessors who were blind to treatment condition. RESULTS: Patients in the waiting list control condition exhibited little change in symptom severity, whereas those in the two treatment conditions exhibited substantial and equivalent change, which was well maintained during follow-up. At the 60-week follow-up assessment, 51.3% of the sample had a level of eating disorder features less than one standard deviation above the community mean. Treatment outcome did not depend on eating disorder diagnosis. Patients with marked mood intolerance, clinical perfectionism, low self-esteem, or interpersonal difficulties appeared to respond better to the more complex treatment, with the reverse pattern evident among the remaining patients. CONCLUSIONS: These two transdiagnostic treatments appear to be suitable for the majority of outpatients with an eating disorder. The simpler treatment may best be viewed as the default version, with the more complex treatment reserved for patients with marked additional psychopathology of the type targeted by the treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040608

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Mitchell JE, 2007, Crow SJ
  2. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2004, Bulimia Nervosa, and Related Eating Disorders.
  3. Fairburn CG, 2008, Bohn K
  4. Fairburn CG, 2008, Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders
  5. Fairburn CG, 2008, Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders
  6. Derogatis LR, 1982, Spencer PM: The Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual
  7. Derogatis LR, 1977, The SCL-90 Manual: Scoring, Administration, and Procedures for the SCL-90
  8. First MB, 1995, Williams JBW: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–829 of 829

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., Doll, H. A., O’Connor, M. E., Bohn, K., Hawker, D. M., Wales, J. A., & Palmer, R. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
ORCID
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
Published
2009-03
Volume
166
Issue
3
Pages
311-319
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
DOI
10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040608
PMC
PMC3035831
OpenAlex
W2143116894
Cited by
829
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 74
FWCI
39.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (046386, 079113, 079113/Z/06/Z)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
eating disorders, transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy, clinical perfectionism, low self-esteem, interpersonal problems, treatment response, symptom maintenance, outpatients
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Demography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Body Mass Index, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review