The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Last observation carried forward versus mixed models in the analysis of psychiatric clinical trials.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We also implemented pattern-mixture models (Hedeker & Gibbons, 1997) to assess whether important slope estimates were dependent on missing data patterns (Hamer & Simpson, 2009) or cohort effects.”
From Impact of dialectical behavior therapy versus community treatment by experts on emotional experience, expression, and acceptance in borderline personality disorder (2014) · cites this paper as Hamer & Simpson, 2009
In the citing paper
“The study applied the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis method.34 In the case of missing data, we applied the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.35”
From Effects of Immersive Virtual Therapy as a Method Supporting Recovery of Depressive Symptoms in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Randomized Controlled Trial (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Mixed modelling allows the use of all available data for each participant to yield unbiased estimates of effects under the assumption that missingness is either completely at random (MCAR) or at random conditional on observed data (MAR) [30].”
From Internet-Based CBT for Depression with and without Telephone Tracking in a National Helpline: Randomised Controlled Trial (2011) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
Recommendations for the Primary Analysis of Continuous Endpoints in Longitudinal Clinical Trials
Mallinckrodt, C. H., Lane, P. W., Schnell, D. J., Peng, Y., & Mancuso, J. P. (2008) · Drug Information Journal · doi:10.1177/009286150804200402 · Cited by 358
MMRM vs. LOCF: A Comprehensive Comparison Based on Simulation Study and 25 NDA Datasets
Siddiqui, O., Hung, H. M. J., & O'Neill, R. (2009) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543400802609797 · Cited by 301
Handling drop‐out in longitudinal clinical trials: a comparison of the LOCF and MMRM approaches
Lane, P. (2008) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.267 · Cited by 262
Siddiqui, O. I., & Ali, M. W. (1998) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543409808835259 · Cited by 135
Canuso, C. M., Dirks, B., Carothers, J. L., Kosik‐Gonzalez, C., Bossie, C. A., Zhu, Y., Damaraju, C. V., Kalali, A. H., & Mahmoud, R. A. (2009) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08040613 · Cited by 86
A Semi‐Parametric Shared Parameter Model to Handle Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missingness
Tsonaka, R., Verbeke, G. N., & Lesaffre, E. M. E. H. (2008) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01021.x · Cited by 71
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The prevention and handling of the missing data
Kang, H. (2013) · Korean Journal of Anesthesiology · doi:10.4097/kjae.2013.64.5.402 · Cited by 1,728
Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: need for standardized criteria
Loerinc, A. G., Meuret, A. E., Twohig, M. P., Rosenfield, D., Bluett, E. J., & Craske, M. G. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.08.004 · Cited by 592
Wilding, J. P. H., Woo, V., Soler, N. G., Pahor, A., Sugg, J., Rohwedder, K., Parikh, S., & for the Dapagliflozin 006 Study Group* (2012) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-6-201203200-00003 · Cited by 478
Neacsiu, A. D., Rizvi, S. L., & Linehan, M. M. (2010) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.05.017 · Cited by 426
Eack, S. M., Hogarty, G. E., Cho, R. Y., Prasad, K. M. R., Greenwald, D. P., Hogarty, S. S., & Keshavan, M. S. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.63 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamer, R. M., & Simpson, P. M.
- ORCID
- Simpson, Pippa M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 639-641
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2153647448
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- last observation carried forward, mixed models, missing data, psychiatric clinical trials, longitudinal analysis, imputation methods
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Mathematical Computing, Patient Dropouts, Statistics as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
