CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 446Mental Health Research TopicsPsychological Testing and AssessmentMental Health and Psychiatry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DSM-5 Field Trials in the United States and Canada, Part III: Development and Reliability Testing of a Cross-Cutting Symptom Assessment for DSM-5

Narrow, William E., Clarke, Diana E., Kuramoto, S. Janet, Kraemer, Helena C., Kupfer, David J., Greiner, Lisa, Regier, Darrel A.·2013·American Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12071000
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to document, in adult and pediatric patient populations, the development, descriptive statistics,and test-retest reliability of cross-cutting symptom measures proposed for inclusion in DSM-5. METHOD: Data were collected as part of the multisite DSM-5 Field Trials in large academic settings. There were seven sites focusing on adult patients and four sites focusing on child and adolescent patients.Cross-cutting symptom measures were self-completed by the patient or an informant before the test and the retest interviews, which were conducted from 4 hours to 2 weeks apart. Clinician-report measures were completed during or after the clinical diagnostic interviews. Informants included adult patients, child patients age 11 and older, parents of all child patients age 6 and older, and legal guardians for adult patients unable to self-complete the measures. Study patients were sampled in a stratified design,and sampling weights were used in data analyses. The mean scores and standard deviations were computed and pooled across adult and child sites. Reliabilities were reported as pooled intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: In adults, test-retest reliabilities of the cross-cutting symptom items generally were good to excellent. At the child and adolescent sites, parents were also reliablereporters of their children’s symptoms,with few exceptions. Reliabilities were not as uniformly good for child respondents, and ICCs for several items fell into the questionable range in this age group. Clinicians rated psychosis with good reliability in adult patients but were less reliable in assessing clinical domains related to psychosis in children and to suicide in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results show promising test-retest reliability results for this group of assessments, many of which are newly developed or have not been previously tested in psychiatric populations

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12071000

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–445 of 445

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Narrow, W. E., Clarke, D. E., Kuramoto, S. J., Kraemer, H. C., Kupfer, D. J., Greiner, L., & Regier, D. A.
Affiliations
American Psychiatric Association (US)
ORCID
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
Published
2013-01
Volume
170
Issue
1
Pages
71-82
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
DOI
10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12071000
OpenAlex
W2154311416
Cited by
446
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 24
FWCI
34.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
DSM-5, test-retest reliability, informant reliability, parent report, child and adolescent psychiatry, suicide assessment, psychiatric symptom assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Canada, Child, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Humans, Patient Care Planning, Prognosis, Psychometrics, Sampling Studies, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review