The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neurofunctional Domains Derived From Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Alcohol Use Disorder
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated whether three neurofunctional domains proposed to be critical in the addiction cycle, namely, incentive salience, negative emotionality, and executive function, could be identified through factor analysis of a deeply phenotyped clinical sample. METHODS: Clinical, behavioral, and self-report measures of addiction, personality, cognition, behavior, and exposure to early-life stress were collected as part of a screening and natural history study of alcohol use disorders in 454 individuals representing the spectrum of alcohol use and use disorders. The multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) approach was used to identify significant predictors of the latent factors identified by the analysis. RESULTS: The results showed significant support for both three- and four-factor models to explain biobehavioral variation in this sample of participants with alcohol use disorder and control subjects, but the three-factor model had the best fit indices. With some nuances, including cross-correlation (lack of independence) between the three factors, the factors corresponded to incentive salience, negative emotionality, and executive function (executive control). The MIMIC model revealed that both exposure to early-life stress and sociodemographic variables predicted these factors. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that three correlated neurofunctional domains are relevant for alcohol use disorder. More work is required to validate and standardize measures of neurofunctional domains in alcohol use disorder, to extend these findings to other addictive disorders, and to relate variations in them to predisposition, clinical course, treatment response, neuroimaging data, and other psychophysical indicators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In a subsequent study, the three neurofunctional domains that were proposed to be critical for the addiction cycle (incentive salience, negative emotionality, and executive function) were validated using a factor analysis of a deeply phenotyped clinical sample (Kwako et al., 2019; Fig. 3).”
From Drug Addiction: Hyperkatifeia/Negative Reinforcement as a Framework for Medications Development (2021) · cites this paper as Kwako et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Clinical, behavioral, and self-report measures of addiction, personality, cognition, behavior, and exposure to early life stress were collected as part of a screening and natural history study of AUD in 454 individuals who represented the spectrum of alcohol use and AUD.A three-factor model generally demonstrated a good fit with the assessment measures, and the factors closely aligned with the Add”
From Drug Addiction: Hyperkatifeia/Negative Reinforcement as a Framework for Medications Development (2021) · cites this paper as Kwako et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Koob, G. F., & Volkow, N. D. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.110 · Cited by 5,340
Self-citationRehm, J., Mathers, C., Popova, S., Thavorncharoensap, M., Teerawattananon, Y., & Patra, J. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60746-7 · Cited by 3,870
Goldstein, R. Z., & Volkow, N. D. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1642 · Cited by 2,667
Self-citationDrug abuse: hedonic homeostatic dysregulation
Koob, G. F., & Moal, M. L. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5335.52 · Cited by 2,535
Self-citationAdverse childhood experiences and the risk of depressive disorders in adulthood
Chapman, D. P., Whitfield, C. L., Felitti, V. J., Dube, S. R., Edwards, V. J., & Anda, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2003.12.013 · Cited by 2,267
Cellular and molecular mechanisms of drug dependence
Koob, G. F., & Bloom, F. E. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2903550 · Cited by 2,070
Self-citationEquifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1996) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579400007318 · Cited by 1,842
Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?
Hu, L.-T., Bentler, P., & Kano, Y. (1992) · Psychological bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.351 · Cited by 1,568
Estimation of a Model with Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes of a Single Latent Variable
Jöreskog, K. G., & Goldberger, A. S. (1975) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1975.10482485 · Cited by 1,408
Addiction, a disease of compulsion and drive: involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex
Volkow, N. D. (2000) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/10.3.318 · Cited by 1,240
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Jöreskog KG, 1975, J Am Stat Assoc, 70, 631
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Drug Addiction: Hyperkatifeia/Negative Reinforcement as a Framework for Medications Development
Koob, G. F. (2021) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pharmrev.120.000083 · Cited by 337
Self-citationAlcohol use disorder and sleep disturbances: a feed-forward allostatic framework
Koob, G. F., & Colrain, I. M. (2019) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-019-0446-0 · Cited by 302
Self-citationVerdejo‐García, A., García–Fernández, G., & Dom, G. (2019) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2019.21.3/gdom · Cited by 201
Addiction as a coping response: hyperkatifeia, deaths of despair, and COVID-19
Koob, G. F., Powell, P., & White, A. (2020) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20091375 · Cited by 166
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwako, L. E., Schwandt, M. L., Ramchandani, V. A., Diazgranados, N., Koob, G. F., Volkow, N. D., Blanco, C., & Goldman, D.
- Affiliations
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kwako, Laura E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2019-09-01
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 744-753
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- PMC
- PMC6609498
- OpenAlex
- W2907276443
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 13.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (Z99‐AA999999)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Keywords
- alcoholism, incentive salience, negative affectivity, executive function, early life stress, addiction cycle, behavioral phenotyping, multiple indicators multiple causes model, factor structure, sociodemographic predictors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alcoholism, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Neuropsychological Tests, Phenotype, Psychological Tests, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Behavior, Addictive, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
