Cited by 28Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neonatal brain response to deviant auditory stimuli and relation to maternal trait anxiety

Open access
Sylvester, Chad M., Myers, Michael J., Perino, Michael T., Kaplan, Sydney, Kenley, Jeanette K., Smyser, Tara A., Warner, Barbara B., Barch, Deanna M. +4 more·2021·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Excessive response to unexpected or "deviant" stimuli during infancy and early childhood represents an early risk marker for anxiety disorders. However, research has yet to delineate the specific brain regions underlying the neonatal response to deviant stimuli near birth and the relation to risk for anxiety disorders. The authors used task-based functional MRI (fMRI) to delineate the neonatal response to deviant stimuli and its relationship to maternal trait anxiety. METHODS: The authors used fMRI to measure brain activity evoked by deviant auditory stimuli in 45 sleeping neonates (mean age, 27.8 days; 60% female; 64% African American). In 41 of the infants, neural response to deviant stimuli was examined in relation to maternal trait anxiety on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, a familial risk factor for offspring anxiety. RESULTS: Neonates manifested a robust and widespread neural response to deviant stimuli that resembles patterns found previously in adults. Higher maternal trait anxiety was related to higher responses within multiple brain regions, including the left and right anterior insula, the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and multiple areas within the anterior cingulate cortex. These areas overlap with brain regions previously linked to anxiety disorders and other psychiatric illnesses in adults. CONCLUSIONS: The neural architecture sensitive to deviant stimuli robustly functions in newborns. Excessive responsiveness of some circuitry components at birth may signal risk for anxiety and other psychiatric disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20050672

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Newborns of more anxious mothers have greater responses to aberrant stimuli in brain regions related to anxiety disorders in adults.

    “A recent task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study showed that newborns of more anxious mothers have greater responses to aberrant stimuli in brain regions related to anxiety disorders in adults (right anterior insula, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and cingulate cortex area).38”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 28

Authors
Sylvester, C. M., Myers, M. J., Perino, M. T., Kaplan, S., Kenley, J. K., Smyser, T. A., Warner, B. B., Barch, D. M., Pine, D. S., Luby, J. L., Rogers, C. E., & Smyser, C. D.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2021-08-01
Volume
178
Issue
8
Pages
771-778
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W3158703689
Cited by
28
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH109983, R01MH113570, K23MH105179, R01MH090786, R37MH113570, R01MH122389, ZIAMH002782, T32MH100019, R01MH113883)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K02NS089852)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K99HD105002, P50HD103525, U54HD087011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
neonatal brain, anxiety disorders, risk indicators, anterior insula, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, infant sleep, familial risk
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Anxiety, Brain, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review