Cited by 40Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Web-Based Simulation in Psychiatry Residency Training: A Pilot Study

Gorrindo, T., Baer, L., Sanders, K. M., Birnbaum, R. J., Fromson, J. A., Sutton-Skinner, K. M., Romeo, S. A., Beresin, E. V.·2011·Academic Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Medical specialties, including surgery, obstetrics, anesthesia, critical care, and trauma, have adopted simulation technology for measuring clinical competency as a routine part of their residency training programs; yet, simulation technologies have rarely been adapted or used for psychiatry training.Objective The authors describe the development of a web-based computer simulation tool intended to assess physician competence in obtaining informed consent before prescribing antipsychotic medication to a simulated patient with symptoms of psychosis.Method Eighteen residents participated in a pilot study of the Computer Simulation Assessment Tool (CSAT). Outcome measures included physician performance on required elements, pre- and post-test measures of physician confidence in obtaining informed consent, and levels of system usability.Results Data suggested that the CSAT increased physician confidence in obtaining informed consent and that it was easy to use.Conclusions The CSAT was an effective educational tool in simulating patient-physician interactions, and it may serve as a model for use of other web-based simulations to augment traditional teaching methods in residency education.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ap.35.4.232

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early virtual patient systems demonstrated that computer-mediated psychiatric dialogues were feasible and effectively supported specific tasks (eg, obtaining informed consent for antipsychotics) to improve trainee confidence and knowledge in controlled studies.

    “Early virtual patient systems demonstrated that computer-mediated psychiatric dialogues were feasible and effectively supported specific tasks (eg, obtaining informed consent for antipsychotics) to improve trainee confidence and knowledge in controlled studies [14], as well as enhance diagnostic reasoning [15] and skill acquisition [16].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gorrindo, T., Baer, L., Sanders, K. M., Birnbaum, R. J., Fromson, J. A., Sutton-Skinner, K. M., Romeo, S. A., & Beresin, E. V.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Gorrindo, T.
Venue
Academic Psychiatry
Published
2011-07-01
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
232-237
ISSN
1042-9670 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982193369
Cited by
40
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
web-based simulation, psychiatry residency training, informed consent, antipsychotic drugs, psychosis, physician confidence, system usability, patient-physician interaction, clinical competency assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Humans, Internship and Residency, Models, Psychological, Pilot Projects, Psychiatry, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review