Cited by 34Psychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsSchizophrenia research and treatment

Characteristics of Frequent Users of an Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Unit: A Five-Year Study in Portugal

Open access
Graca, Joao, Klut, Catarina, Trancas, Bruno, Borja-Santos, Nuno, Cardoso, Graça·2013·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined demographic and clinical characteristics of frequent users of a psychiatric inpatient unit in Portugal. METHODS: Data (2004-2008) for 1,348 consecutive psychiatric inpatients were reviewed. Frequent users (N=137), who had at least three admissions in the study period, were compared with nonfrequent users (N=1,211) on age, gender, race-ethnicity, diagnosis, and compulsory admissions. Data were analyzed with chi square and Student's t tests. RESULTS: Frequent users accounted for 29% of admissions. They were significantly younger than nonfrequent users (39±14 versus 44±17, p<.001), and a larger proportion had compulsory admissions (28% versus 14%, p<.001). The frequent user group also had significantly higher rates of bipolar disorder (61% versus 46%, p<.001) and schizophrenia (29% versus 18%, p<.003). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding characteristics of frequent users can inform development of appropriate services. Research should address other variables related to frequent admissions, including socioeconomic factors, general medical and psychiatric comorbidities, and treatment compliance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.000782012

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies found that following an involuntary admission people were more likely to be re-hospitalised than following voluntary admissions, over a wide range of time-periods.

    “Some studies found that following an involuntary admission people were more likely to be re-hospitalised than following voluntary admissions, over a wide range of time-periods (58–68).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graca, J., Klut, C., Trancas, B., Borja-Santos, N., & Cardoso, G.
Affiliations
University of Lisbon (PT)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2013-02
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
192-195
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2148615459
Cited by
34
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
psychiatric hospital admissions, involuntary admission, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, demographic factors, clinical features, psychiatric service utilization, Portugal
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Female, Hospital Units, Humans, Inpatients, Length of Stay, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Readmission, Portugal, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review