Cited by 46Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Patient Involvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Common Factors: Evidence-Based Practice and Recovery

Davidson, Larry, Chan, Kevin K. S.·2014·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

The authors of this Open Forum argue that the evidence-based practice movement has not paid adequate attention to the wealth of evidence that supports a central role for the so-called common factors that constitute a therapeutic alliance between practitioner and patient. They also suggest that progress might be made in improving the quality of community-based care for persons with serious mental illnesses and addictions if training programs returned to an emphasis on helping practitioners develop the skills involved in cultivating trusting and empathic relationships with the people they serve. The authors draw connections between the skills needed for such relationships and the skills involved in providing recovery-oriented care and peer support, two recent developments that call for a reinvestment in basic relationship-building skills for all behavioral health practitioners.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201300274

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lambert MJ, 2012, Psychotherapy Relationships that Work: Therapists’ Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients
  2. Wampold BE, 2001, Applied and Preventive Psychology, 10, 69

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Davidson, L., & Chan, K. K. S.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2014-05
Volume
65
Issue
5
Pages
675-677
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W1976664703
Cited by
42
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services
  • Yale University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
common factors, therapeutic relationship, evidence-based practice, recovery-oriented care, peer support, community-based care, severe mental illness, addiction, empathic relationship, practitioner training, relationship skills
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Professional Competence, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychiatry, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review