Cited by 18Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health servicesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Trauma and Trauma-Informed Care in Early Intervention in Psychosis: State of Implementation and Provider Views on Challenges

Wood, Helen J., Babusci, Christina, Bendall, Sarah, Sarpal, Deepak K., Jones, Nev·2023·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although trauma is increasingly recognized as a major risk factor for psychosis and for its link to treatment outcomes, the landscape of trauma-related practices in specialized early psychosis services in the United States and other countries remains only poorly characterized. Research documenting the perspectives of frontline providers is also lacking. The primary goals of this study were to document the state of trauma-related policy implementation in early intervention in psychosis (EIP) programs and to gather provider perspectives. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods project involving an international EIP provider survey, followed by in-depth provider interviews. The survey was disseminated in Australia, Canada, Chile, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In total, 164 providers, representing 110 unique sites, completed the survey. Frequencies were calculated for responses to survey items, and open-ended responses were analyzed with a systematic content analysis. RESULTS: The survey findings suggested low implementation rates for a variety of assessment and support practices related to trauma and trauma-informed care. Coding of open-ended responses revealed numerous concerns and uncertainties among providers regarding the relationship between trauma and psychosis and the state of the EIP field. CONCLUSIONS: An expansion of research and service development aimed at better meeting the trauma-related needs of young people with psychosis is essential, with implications for EIP outcomes and service user and staff experiences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.20220624

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wood, H. J., Babusci, C., Bendall, S., Sarpal, D. K., & Jones, N.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2023-12-01
Volume
74
Issue
12
Pages
1240-1246
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W4376871000
Cited by
18
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
trauma-informed care, early intervention in psychosis, trauma, psychosis, provider perspectives, trauma assessment, young people with psychosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, Humans, Psychotic Disorders, United States, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review