Race, Gender, and Psychiatrists' Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Depression Among Elderly Patients
Abstract
Objective This study examined psychiatrists' contributions to racial and gender disparities in diagnosis and treatment among elderly persons. Methods Psychiatrists who volunteered to participate in the study were randomly assigned to one of four video vignettes depicting an elderly patient with late-life depression. The vignettes differed only in terms of the race of the actor portraying the patient (white or African American) and gender. The study participants were 329 psychiatrists who attended the 2002 annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association. Results Eighty-one percent of the psychiatrists assigned the elderly patient a diagnosis of major depression. Patients' race and gender was not associated with significant differences in the diagnoses of major depression, assessment of most patient characteristics, or recommendations for managing the disorder. However, psychiatrists' characteristics, particularly the location of the medical school at which the psychiatrist was trained (United States versus international), were significantly associated with a number of variables. Conclusions Given standardized symptom pictures, psychiatrists are no less likely to diagnose or treat depression among African-American elderly patients than among other patients, which suggests that bias based simply on race is not a likely explanation for racial differences in diagnosis and treatments found in earlier clinical studies. The impact of psychiatrists' having trained at internatio…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In one study, estimates of SES were significantly related to estimates of patient demeanour, with lower SES associated with hostile patient demeanour.
“one reported that estimates of SES in turn were significantly related to estimates of patient demeanour (lower SES associated with hostile patient demeanour) [37].”
From Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as [37]
The two studies that reported no evidence of bias in diagnosis of depression found that physicians' estimates of SES were influenced by race, with lower SES estimated for black patients.
“The two studies that reported no evidence of bias in diagnosis of depression found that physicians’ estimates of SES were influenced by race (lower SES estimated for black patients); [37, 38]”
From Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as [37]
Cites
The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patients
van Ryn, M., & Burke, J. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00338-x · Cited by 1,509 · see citing works
Disparities in care for depression among primary care patients
Miranda, J., & Cooper, L. A. (2004) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30272.x · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
FitzGerald, C., & Hurst, S. (2017) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8 · Cited by 2,398 · see citing works
Pickett, Y. R., Bazelais, K. N., & Bruce, M. L. (2013) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.3908 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Lutfey, K. E., Link, C. L., Grant, R. W., Marceau, L. D., & McKinlay, J. B. (2009) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.06.007 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Hoeft, T. J., Hinton, L., Liu, J., & Unützer, J. (2016) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2015.07.003 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kales, H. C., Neighbors, H. W., Blow, F. C., Taylor, K. K. K., Gillon, L., Welsh, D. E., Maixner, S. M., & Mellow, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
- VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
- Venue
- Psychiatric Services
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 721-728
- ISSN
- 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
- 1075-2730
- 1557-9700
- OpenAlex
- W2136001089
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- racial disparities, gender disparities, geriatric depression, major depressive disorder, elderly patients, African American patients, treatment guidelines, medical school location, cultural competence, geriatric psychiatry, video vignettes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Black or African American, Major Depressive Disorder, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Psychiatry, Psychometrics, Sex Factors, Stereotyping, Patient Simulation, Black People, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review