Cited by 174Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Major Depression on Subjective and Objective Cognitive Deficits in Mild to Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury

Open access
Chamelian, Laury, Feinstein, Anthony·2006·The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

The effect of major depression on subjective and objective cognitive deficits 6 months following mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) was assessed in 63 subjects. Patients with subjective cognitive complaints (n=63) were more likely to be women, with higher Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores and have a diagnosis of major depression. They also performed significantly more poorly on various measures of memory, attention and executive functioning. Group differences on most but not all cognitive measures disappeared in a multivariate analysis when controlling for depression. In mild to moderate TBI, subjective cognitive deficits are linked in large measure to comorbid major depression. However, other mechanisms may also account for these deficits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/jnp.18.1.33

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McAllister TW, Sparling MB, Flashman LA, et al: Reduction in episodic memory circuitry is related to traumatic brain injury severity. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2001; 13:141

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–173 of 173

Metadata

Authors
Chamelian, L., & Feinstein, A.
Affiliations
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Feinstein, Anthony
Venue
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Published
2006-02
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
33-38
ISSN
  • 0895-0172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7222
OpenAlex
W2137174078
Cited by
174
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
major depressive disorder, traumatic brain injury, mild to moderate TBI, subjective cognitive complaints, memory, attention, executive function, comorbidities, Glasgow Coma Scale, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cognition Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Risk Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Glasgow Coma Scale, Post-Concussion Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review