Cited by 139Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersDeep Brain Stimulation and Movement DisordersElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder With Ventral Capsular/Ventral Striatal Gamma Capsulotomy: A Pilot Prospective Study

Open access
Lopes, Antonio Carlos, Greenberg, Benjamin D., Norén, Georg, Canteras, Miguel Montes, Busatto, Geraldo F., de Mathis, Maria Eugênia, Taub, Anita, D’Alcante, Carina Chaubet, Hoexter, Marcelo Queiroz, Gouvea, Fernando Sauerbronn, Cecconi, Janaína Philippi, Gentil, André F., Ferrão, Ygor Arzeno, Fuentes, Daniel, de Castro, Cláudio Campi, Leite, Cláudia C., Salvajoli, João Victor, Duran, Fábio L. S., Rasmussen, Steven, Miguel, Eurípedes Constantino·2009·The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

A subgroup of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients remains refractory to conventional treatments. For them, a new stereotactic radiosurgery has been recently developed: the ventral capsular/ventral striatal (VC/VS) gamma capsulotomy. The authors aim to report efficacy and adverse events of VC/VS gamma capsulotomy. Five refractory OCD patients were selected. The authors assessed OCD, anxiety and depressive symptoms, and side effects pre- and postoperatively. Three patients (60%) met response criteria 48 months after surgery. Adverse effects were episodic and transient. Ventral capsular/ventral striatal gamma capsulotomy holds therapeutic promise, with few adverse effects. (The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2009; 21:381-392)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/jnp.2009.21.4.381

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Jenike MA, 1994, J Clin Psychiatry, 55, 11
  2. Perse T, 1988, J Clin Psychiatry, 49, 48
  3. Rasmussen SA, 1997, J Clin Psychiatry, 58, 9
  4. Rylander G, 1978, Lakartidningen, 75, 547
  5. Norén G, 2002, Gamma Knife capsulotomy for obsessive-compulsive disorder
  6. First MB, 1997, User's Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders - clinician version (SCID-CV)
  7. Pfohl B, 1997, Zimmerman M: Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV)
  8. Guy, 1976, Revised (publication ADM 76-338).
  9. Guy W, 1986, Psychopharmacol Bull, 22, 397
  10. Rück C: Capsulotomy in anxiety disorders. Thesis for doctoral degree (PhD)[Dissertation].Stockholm, Karolinska Intitutet, 2006
  11. Mindus P, 1986, Acta Radiol Suppl, 369, 444

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lopes, A. C., Greenberg, B. D., Norén, G., Canteras, M. M., Busatto, G. F., de Mathis, M. E., Taub, A., D’Alcante, C. C., Hoexter, M. Q., Gouvea, F. S., Cecconi, J. P., Gentil, A. F., Ferrão, Y. A., Fuentes, D., de Castro, C. C., Leite, C. C., Salvajoli, J. V., Duran, F. L. S., Rasmussen, S., & Miguel, E. C.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Published
2009-10
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
381-392
ISSN
  • 0895-0172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7222
OpenAlex
W4240623650
Cited by
139
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder, stereotactic radiosurgery, deep brain stimulation, treatment-resistant OCD, adverse effects, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, long-term treatment response
MeSH terms
Adult, Basal Ganglia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Radiosurgery, Treatment Outcome, Internal Capsule

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review