Treatment seeking among Ontario problem gamblers: results of a population survey
Abstract
Objective This study examined help seeking for gambling concerns among people with different levels of gambling problems.Methods Ontario adults who had gambled more than dollars 100 (N=4,217) and who screened positive for a possible gambling problem (N=1,205) were classified according to gambling problem severity and asked about their experiences with gambling treatment.Results Only 6% of gamblers had ever accessed a service, including a self-help group or self-help materials. With self-help materials excluded, only 3% of gamblers (from 1% of those who met only the initial CLiP screening criteria to 53% of those with pathological gambling) had sought treatment for gambling.Conclusions Few gamblers sought treatment for gambling problems; greater problem severity was associated with greater likelihood of using treatment, with self-help materials used most often. Further research is needed on why treatment seeking is low and on the effectiveness of self-help resources in reaching gamblers with problems in earlier stages.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Internet-based interventions make it possible to overcome important treatment-seeking barriers, such as stigma, embarrassment, and accessibility.
“Internet-based interventions make it possible to overcome important treatment-seeking barriers, such as stigma, embarrassment, and accessibility (Cunningham, 2007; Gainsbury et al., 2013; Suurvali et al., 2008).”
From Efficacy of an internet-based psychological intervention for problem gambling and gambling disorder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2021) · cites this paper as Suurvali et al., 2008
Only 18% of problem gamblers seek formal assistance.
“18% of problem gamblers seek formal assistance (Suurvali et al., 2008).”
From Online and Mobile Interventions for Problem Gambling, Alcohol, and Drugs: A Systematic Review (2017) · cites this paper as Suurvali et al., 2008
Help-seeking rates are low.
“help-seeking rates are low.”
From Online and Mobile Interventions for Problem Gambling, Alcohol, and Drugs: A Systematic Review (2017) · cites this paper as Suurvali et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 164
- Authors
- Suurvali, H., Hodgins, D., Toneatto, T., & Cunningham, J.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Suurvali, Helen
- ORCID
- Toneatto, Tony
- Venue
- Psychiatric Services
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1343-1346
- ISSN
- 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
- 1075-2730
- 1557-9700
- OpenAlex
- W1966887104
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- problem gambling, help-seeking, gambling treatment, treatment seeking, problem severity, gambling addiction, self-help groups, self-help materials, Ontario
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Gambling, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Ontario, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Health Care Surveys
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review