Cited by 147Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologySchizophrenia research and treatmentCultural Competency in Health Care

A Randomized Trial of Spiritual Assessment of Outpatients With Schizophrenia: Patients' and Clinicians' Experience

Open access
Huguelet, Philippe, Mohr, Sylvia, Betrisey, Carine, Borras, Laurence, Gillieron, Christiane, Marie, Adham Mancini, Rieben, Isabelle, Perroud, Nader +1 more·2011·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recovery-oriented care for patients with schizophrenia involves consideration of cultural issues, such as religion and spirituality. However, there is evidence that psychiatrists rarely address such topics. This study examined acceptance of a spiritual assessment by patients and clinicians, suggestions for treatment that arose from the assessment, and patient outcomes--in terms of treatment compliance and satisfaction with care (as measured by treatment alliance). METHODS: Outpatients with psychosis were randomly assigned to two groups: an intervention group that received traditional treatment and a religious and spiritual assessment (N=40) and a control group that received only traditional treatment (N=38). Eight psychiatrists were trained to administer the assessment to their established and stable patients. After each administration, the psychiatrist attended a supervision session with a psychiatrist and a psychologist of religion. Baseline and three-month data were collected. RESULTS: The spiritual assessment was well accepted by patients. During supervision, psychiatrists reported potential clinical uses for the assessment information for 67% of patients. No between-group differences in medication adherence and satisfaction with care were found at three months, although patients in the intervention group had significantly better appointment attendance during the follow-up period. Their interest in discussing religion and spirituality with their psychiatrists remained high. The process was not as well accepted by psychiatrists. CONCLUSIONS: Spiritual assessment can raise important clinical issues in the treatment of patients with chronic schizophrenia. Cultural factors, such as religion and spirituality, should be considered early in clinical training, because many clinicians are not at ease addressing such topics with patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ps.62.1.pss6201_0079

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Sowers W: Transforming systems of care: the American Association of Community Psychiatrists Guidelines for Recovery Ori- ented Services. Community Mental Health Journal 41:757-774, 2005
  2. Fallot RD: Spirituality and religion in re- covery: some current issues. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 30:261-270, 2007
  3. Baetz M, Toews J: Clinical implications of research on religion, spirituality, and men- tal health. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 54:292-301, 2009
  4. Bussema EF, Bussema KE: Gilead revisit- ed: faith and recovery. Psychiatric Rehabil- itation Journal 30:301-305, 2007
  5. Borras L, Mohr S, Brandt PY, et al: Reli- gious beliefs in schizophrenia: their rele- vance for adherence to treatment. Schizo- phrenia Bulletin 33:1238-1246, 2007
  6. Borras L, Mohr S, Brandt PY, et al: Reli- gion and spirituality: how clinicians in Quebec and Geneva cope with the issue when faced with patients suffering from chronic psychosis. Community Mental Health Journal 46:77-86, 2010
  7. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, et al: The Mini-International Neuropsychi- atric Interview (MINI): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 59 (suppl 20):22-33, 1998
  8. Corrigan PW, Salzer M, Ralph RO, et al: Examining the factor structure of the Re- covery Assessment Scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin 30:1035-1041, 2004
  9. Mohr S, Gillieron C, Borras L, et al: The assessment of spirituality and religiousness in schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 195:247-253, 2007
  10. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A: Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. College Station, Tex, Stata Press, 2005
  11. Pierre J: Faith or delusion ? At the cross- roads of religion and psychosis. Journal of Psychiatric Practices 7:163-172, 2001
  12. Phillips RE 3rd, Lakin R, Pargament KI: Development and implementation of a spiritual issues psychoeducational group for those with serious mental illness. Com- munity Mental Health Journal 38:487- 495, 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huguelet, P., Mohr, S., Betrisey, C., Borras, L., Gillieron, C., Marie, A. M., Rieben, I., Perroud, N., & Brandt, P.-Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Dr. Huguelet, Dr. Mohr, Ms. Betrisey, Dr. Borras, Dr. Marie, and Dr. Perroud are affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Geneva and University of Geneva, 36 Rue de 31 Décembre, Geneva 1207, Switzerland (e-mail: ).
  • Dr. Gillieron is with the Psychology and Education Sciences Faculty, University of Geneva.
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2011-01
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
79-86
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2119127680
Cited by
147
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (114136)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
spiritual assessment, schizophrenia, religion and spirituality, psychosis, outpatients, treatment alliance, medication adherence, patient satisfaction, appointment attendance, clinician attitudes, cultural competence, recovery-oriented care
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Care Planning, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychological Tests, Schizophrenia, Switzerland, Likelihood Functions, Linear Models, Patient Satisfaction, Spirituality, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review