Cited by 13Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareMental Health and Patient InvolvementSchizophrenia research and treatment

Efficacy of shared decision making on treatment satisfaction for patients with first-admission schizophrenia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Open access
Ishii, Mio, Okumura, Yasuyuki, Sugiyama, Naoya, Hasegawa, Hana, Noda, Toshie, Hirayasu, Yoshio, Ito, Hiroto·2014·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making is a promising model for patient-centred medicine, resulting in better clinical outcomes overall. In the mental health field, interventions that consider the patient-centred perspective--such as patient quality of life, involvement in the treatment, treatment satisfaction, and working alliance--have increased and better clinical outcomes discovered for patients with schizophrenia. However, few studies have examined the efficacy of shared decision making for schizophrenia treatment. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of a shared decision making intervention compared to treatment as usual on patient satisfaction at discharge for first-admission patients with schizophrenia. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomised, parallel-group, two-arm, open-label, single-centre study currently being conducted in an acute psychiatric ward of Numazu Chuo Hospital, Japan. We are recruiting patients between 16 and 65 years old who are admitted to the ward with a diagnosis of schizophrenia without prior experience of psychiatric admission. Fifty-eight participants are being randomised into a shared decision making intervention group or a treatment as usual control group in a 1:1 ratio. The intervention program was developed based on a shared decision making model and is presented as a weekly course lasting the duration of the patients' acute psychiatric ward stay. The primary outcome measure is patient satisfaction at discharge as assessed by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Due to the study's nature, neither the patient nor staff can be blinded. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of shared decision making for patients with early-treatment-stage schizophrenia. The intervention program in this study is innovative in that it includes both of the patient and staff who are involved in the treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01869660.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-244x-14-111

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ishii, M., Okumura, Y., Sugiyama, N., Hasegawa, H., Noda, T., Hirayasu, Y., & Ito, H.
Affiliations
  • Yokohama City University (JP)
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
  • Numazu City Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Ishii, Mio
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2014-04-14
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
111-111
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050321467
Cited by
13
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
shared decision-making, schizophrenia, first-episode psychosis, treatment satisfaction, patient-centered care, acute psychiatric wards, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, therapeutic relationship, patient participation in treatment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cooperative Behavior, Decision Making, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review