The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Primary and Secondary Effects in Class Differentials in Educational Attainment: The Transition to A-Level Courses in England and Wales
Open accessAbstract
In this article we start from Boudon's important, but still surprisingly neglected, distinction between `primary' and `secondary' effects in the creation of class differentials in educational attainment. Primary effects are all those, whether of a genetic or socio-cultural kind, that are expressed via the association between children's class backgrounds and their actual levels of academic performance. Secondary effects are those that are expressed via the educational choices that children from differing class backgrounds make within the range of choice that their previous performance allows them. We apply a method introduced by Erikson and Jonsson to represent the relationship between primary and secondary effects in analysing class differentials in one crucial transition within the English and Welsh educational system: that which children make at around age 16 and which determines whether or not they will pursue the higher-level academic qualifications — A-levels — that are usually required for university entry. We then use a development of this method that we have earlier proposed in order to produce quantitative estimates of the relative importance of primary and secondary effects as they operate within this transition. We show that secondary effects reinforce primary effects to a substantial extent, accounting for at least one quarter, and possibly up to one-half, of class differentials as measured by odds ratios. In conclusion, we consider some theoretical and policy implications of our findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates
Blinder, A. S. (1973) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/144855 · Cited by 6,922
Carneiro, P. M., & Heckman, J. J. (2003) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.434544 · Cited by 1,325
Cited by
Comparing Coefficients of Nested Nonlinear Probability Models
Kohler, U., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2011) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x1101100306 · Cited by 1,041
Mijs, J. J. B. (2016) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-014-0228-0 · Cited by 290
Income Inequality, Intergenerational Mobility, and the Great Gatsby Curve: Is Education the Key?
Jerrim, J., & Macmillan, L. (2015) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sov075 · Cited by 253
Direct and indirect effects in a logit model
Buis, M. L. (2010) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x1001000104 · Cited by 251
Socioeconomic inequality in access to high-status colleges: A cross-country comparison
Jerrim, J., Chmielewski, A. K., & Parker, P. (2015) · Research in Social Stratification and Mobility · doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2015.06.003 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, M., Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Yaish, M.
- Venue
- Acta Sociologica
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 211-229
- ISSN
- 0001-6993 (ISSN-L)
- 1502-3869
- OpenAlex
- W2096988020
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 58.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary and Secondary Effects in Class Differentials in Educational Attainment: The Transition to A-Level Courses in England and Wales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0001699307080926
- The paper
- Jackson, M., Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Yaish, M. (2007). Primary and Secondary Effects in Class Differentials in Educational Attainment: The Transition to A-Level Courses in England and Wales. Acta Sociologica. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699307080926
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.