Cited by 1,041Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceSpatial and Panel Data Analysis

Comparing Coefficients of Nested Nonlinear Probability Models

Open access
Kohler, Ulrich, Karlson, Kristian Bernt, Holm, Anders·2011·The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata

Abstract

In a series of recent articles, Karlson, Holm, and Breen (Breen, Karlson, and Holm, 2011, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid=1730065 ; Karlson and Holm, 2011, Research in Stratification and Social Mobility 29: 221– 237; Karlson, Holm, and Breen, 2010, http://www.yale.edu/ciqle/Breen Scaling %20effects.pdf) have developed a method for comparing the estimated coefficients of two nested nonlinear probability models. In this article, we describe this method and the user-written program khb, which implements the method. The KHB method is a general decomposition method that is unaffected by the rescaling or attenuation bias that arises in cross-model comparisons in nonlinear models. It recovers the degree to which a control variable, Z, mediates or explains the relationship between X and a latent outcome variable, Y * , underlying the nonlinear probability model. It also decomposes effects of both discrete and continuous variables, applies to average partial effects, and provides analytically derived statistical tests. The method can be extended to other models in the generalized linear model family.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1536867x1101100306

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kohler, U., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A.
Affiliations
  • Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
  • Karlson, Kristian Bernt
  • Holm, Anders
Venue
The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
Published
2011-10
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
420-438
ISSN
  • 1536-867X (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-8734
OpenAlex
W2147660973
Cited by
1,041
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Keywords
mediation, attenuation bias, effect decomposition, average partial effects, generalized linear models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review