CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 433Cultural Differences and ValuesCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 182 of the 186 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Impact of Culture on Creativity: How Cultural Tightness and Cultural Distance Affect Global Innovation Crowdsourcing Work

Open access
Chua, Roy Y. J., Roth, Yannig, Lemoine, Jean-François·2015·Administrative Science Quarterly
DOI 10.1177/0001839214563595
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper advances a new theoretical model to understand the effect of culture on creativity in a global context. We theorize that creativity engagement and success depend on the cultural tightness—the extent to which a country is characterized by strong social norms and low tolerance for deviant behaviors—of both an innovator’s country and the audience’s country, as well as the cultural distance between these two countries. Using field data from a global online crowdsourcing platform that organizes creative contests for consumer-product brands, supplemented by interviews with marketing experts, we found that individuals from tight cultures are less likely than counterparts from loose cultures to engage in and succeed at foreign creative tasks; this effect is intensified as the cultural distance between the innovator’s and the audience’s country increases. Additionally, tight cultures are less receptive to foreign creative ideas. But we also found that in certain circumstances—when members of a tight culture do creative work in their own or culturally close countries—cultural tightness can actually promote creativity success. This finding implies that some degree of convergent thinking as engendered by tight cultures could be beneficial for creativity, challenging the dominant view in creativity research that divergent thinking is a prerequisite for creative performance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0001839214563595

Cites

182 of 182 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 186 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Brabham D. C., 2012, International Journal of Communication, 6, 1139
  2. Chiu C.-y., 2005, Handbook of Motivation and Competence, 489
  3. Csikszentmihalyi M., 1990, Theories of Creativity, 190
  4. Csikszentmihalyi M., 1999, Handbook of Creativity, 313
  5. Deloitte University Press 2014 “Tech trends 2014: Industrialized crowdsourcing.” http://dupress.com/articles/2014-tech-trends-crowdsourcing/.
  6. 10.2307/258770 · DOI
  7. Hardin C. D., 1996, Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, 3, 28
  8. Janssen O., 2014, Human Relations, 67, 945
  9. King A., 2013, MIT Sloan Management Review, 55, 41
  10. Lubart T. I., 1999, Handbook of Creativity, 339
  11. Nagaoka S., 2009, RIETI Discussion Paper Series 09-E-010
  12. Niu W., 2002, Contemporary Studies, 36, 269
  13. Prpić J., 2014, Paper presented at the 12th Annual Open and User Innovation Conference
  14. Schwartz S. H., 1994, Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, 85
  15. 10.1509/jmkg.73.1.003 · DOI
  16. Torrance E. P., 1998, The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Norms—Technical Manual Figural (Streamlined) Forms A & B
  17. Wang A. Y., 2011, Journal of International and Cross-Cultural Studies, 2, 1
  18. Weisberg R. W., 1999, Handbook of Creativity, 226

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 429

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chua, R. Y. J., Roth, Y., & Lemoine, J.-F.
Affiliations
  • Singapore Management University (SG)
  • Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
  • ESCA Ecole de Management (MA)
ORCID
Venue
Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2014-12-08
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
189-227
ISSN
  • 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-3815
DOI
10.1177/0001839214563595
OpenAlex
W2148882560
Semantic Scholar
ea3a76d13fdabb5d9216d788f7a07e5f8f1efb6e
Cited by
433
References
186
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 11
FWCI
38.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Administrative Science Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
Keywords
culture and creativity, cultural tightness, cultural distance, crowdsourcing contests, social norms, convergent thinking, divergent thinking, cross-cultural creativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review