The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward an Anthropology of Public Policy
Abstract
As the rational choice model of “policy” proliferates in “policy studies, ” the social sciences, modern governments, organizations, and everyday life, a number of anthropologists are beginning to develop a body of work in the anthropology of public policy that critiques the assumptions of “policy” as a legal-rational way of getting things done. While de-masking the framing of public policy questions, an anthropological approach attempts to uncover the constellations of actors, activities, and influences that shape policy decisions, their implementation, and their results. In a rapidly changing world, anthropologists’ empirical and ethnographic methods can show how policies actively create new categories of individuals to be governed. They also suggest that the long-established frameworks of “state” and “private, ”“local” or “national” and “global, ”“macro” and “micro, ”“top down” and “bottom up, ” and “centralized” and “decentralized” not only fail to capture current dynamics in the world but actually obfuscate the understanding of many policy processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization.
de Zoysa, D. A., & Appadurai, A. (1998) · International Migration Review · doi:10.2307/2547675 · Cited by 18,135
Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought
Rose, N. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511488856 · Cited by 6,346
Social Network Analysis: A Handbook.
Pappi, F. U., & Scott, J. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075047 · Cited by 5,969
Powers of freedom: reframing political thought
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-3035 · Cited by 5,663
Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6033 · Cited by 3,834
Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences
Laitin, D. D., Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1987) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1386453 · Cited by 3,658
Foucault, M., & Rabinow, P. (1984) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 3,181
Fischer, J. L., & Hymes, D. (1974) · The Journal of American Folklore · doi:10.2307/538979 · Cited by 2,120
The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism
Povinelli, E. A. (2002) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822383673 · Cited by 1,933
Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self.
Hewitt, J. P., & Rose, N. (1991) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579520 · Cited by 1,772
Cited by
Otañez, M. G., Mamudu, H. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2009) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2008.146217 · Cited by 100
Maritato, C. (2018) · European journal of Turkish studies · doi:10.4000/ejts.6020 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Wedel, J. R., Shore, C., Feldman, G., & Lathrop, S.
- Venue
- The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 600
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-51
- ISSN
- 0002-7162 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2149260752
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 20.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward an Anthropology of Public Policy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0002716205276734
- The paper
- Wedel, J. R., Shore, C., Feldman, G., & Lathrop, S. (2005). Toward an Anthropology of Public Policy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205276734
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.