Cited by 66Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationAmerican Political and Social DynamicsAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics

Polarization, Gridlock, and Presidential Campaign Politics in 2016

Jacobson, Gary C.·2016·The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Abstract

The American electorate has grown increasingly divided along party lines in recent decades, by political attitudes, social values, basic demography, and even beliefs about reality. Deepening partisan divisions have inspired high levels of party-line voting and low levels of ticket splitting, resulting in thoroughly nationalized, president- and party-centered federal elections. Because of the way the electoral system aggregates votes, however, historically high levels of electoral coherence have delivered incoherent, divided government and policy stalemate. The 2016 nomination campaigns have exposed deep fissures within as well as between the parties, and their results threaten to shake up electoral patterns that have prevailed so far during this century, with uncertain and perhaps unpredictable consequences for national politics. The 2016 election is certain to polarize the electorate, but the axis of polarization may not fall so neatly along party lines as it has in recent years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0002716216658921

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polarization along party lines in the United States is on the rise, and the 2016 elections deepened the divide.

    “Polarization along party lines in the United States is on the rise2, and 2016 elections have deepen the divide3.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobson, G. C.
Corresponding author
Jacobson, Gary C.
Venue
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Published
2016-08-17
Volume
667
Issue
1
Pages
226-246
ISSN
  • 0002-7162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3349
OpenAlex
W2509571293
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
37.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › American Constitutional Law and Politics
Keywords
2016 US presidential election, political polarization, party-line voting, ticket splitting, divided government, political stalemate, presidential nomination campaigns, party nominations, electoral systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review