CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPopulism, Right-Wing MovementsAmerican Political and Social Dynamics

Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics, Still?

Hetherington, Marc J., Weiler, Jonathan D.·2015·American Gridlock
DOI 10.1017/cbo9781316287002.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

• A personality based, authoritarian-nonauthoritarian, divide continues to structure party conflict in America, providing it with the characteristics of polarization. • Barack Obamae's ascendancy to the presidency, in fact, has deepened the divide we identified as emerging in the early 2000s. • The issue agenda, which is central to understanding personality-based polarization, has evolved in ways that have also deepened the divide, particularly with the emergence of immigration reform as a central concern. • The Tea Party represents the clearest embodiment of the authoritarian politics that defines the current political right, pushing a substantive issue agenda but also eliciting deeper-seated emotions about order and change in American politics. Our book, Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics , was published in 2009 (Hetherington and Weiler 2009). In it, we argued that politics had increasingly become organized around a fundamental worldview/personality divide. This was because peoplee's preferences about many of the most important issues of the day – race, feminism, immigration, gay rights, and the proper responses to terrorism – are all, in large measure, driven by the same worldview/personality characteristic. We called that characteristic authoritarianism, although scholars have used many terms to describe those with the outlook we identified. Given the timing of our booke's release, the most up-to-date data we could employ were gathered during the 2008 primary season. Much about politics has changed since then. Moreover, some of the new developments might suggest the critical change in the partisan divide that we identified then could have turned out to be more a blip in history than the durable worldview evolution we diagnosed. Critics might, for example, identify the election of Barack Obama, the first African-American president, as evidence that the importance of race, the first layer of the process of worldview evolution that we argued was occurring, had been resolved. In addition, the issue agenda changed dramatically after Obamae's election, with matters involving foreign wars and terrorism less pronounced than they were during the Bush administration. Because our original analysis had suggested the central importance of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in forging the new worldview divide, the diminishing importance of such issues could, in turn, reduce authoritarianisme's effect in structuring party conflict. Similarly, gay rights, another key issue we identified in defining the worldview divide, is perhaps on its way to resolution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781316287002.006

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
ORCID
Hetherington, Marc J.
Venue
American Gridlock
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
2015-11-12
Pages
86-112
DOI
10.1017/cbo9781316287002.006
OpenAlex
W4246780759
Cited by
12
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.31
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
Keywords
authoritarianism, political polarization, party conflict, issue agendas, immigration reform, Tea Party movement, Barack Obama, race, gay rights, terrorism, American politics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review