Cited by 569Global trade and economicsIntellectual Property and PatentsInnovation and Knowledge Management

The Market for Know-How and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology

Teece, David J.·1981·The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Abstract

This article explores the nature of international technology transfer and the operation of the market for know-how. It begins by examining the relationship between codification and transfer costs and then analyzes various imperfections in the market for know-how. The special properties of know-how are shown to confound various aspects of the exchange process when arms-length contracting is involved. The internalization of the exchange process within multinational firms serves to bypass many of these difficulties, and explains why the multinational firm is of such importance. Several forms of regulation of technology imports and exports are examined. It is discovered that the process is insufficiently well understood to permit the design of effective regulation that, moreover, appears unlikely to eliminate inefficiency. An efficiency focus is maintained throughout since I feel no qualification to pontificate on complex and confused distributional issues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000271628145800107

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because the market for information/knowledge about new opportunities isn't well developed, entrepreneurs and managers must build organizational capabilities inside business firms to assist in knowledge creation and knowledge capture.

    “Because the market for information/ knowledge about new opportunities (Gans & Stern, 2010; Teece, 1981b) isn't well developed, entrepreneurs and managers must build organizational capabilities inside businesses firms to assist in knowledge creation and knowledge capture (Teece, 1986b, 2006b).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teece, D. J.
Corresponding author
Teece, David J.
Venue
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Published
1981-11
Volume
458
Issue
1
Pages
81-96
ISSN
  • 0002-7162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3349
OpenAlex
W2122589220
Cited by
569
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 19
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
know-how, international technology transfer, codification, transfer costs, market imperfections, multinational corporations, efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review