The Market for Know-How and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology
Abstract
This article explores the nature of international technology transfer and the operation of the market for know-how. It begins by examining the relationship between codification and transfer costs and then analyzes various imperfections in the market for know-how. The special properties of know-how are shown to confound various aspects of the exchange process when arms-length contracting is involved. The internalization of the exchange process within multinational firms serves to bypass many of these difficulties, and explains why the multinational firm is of such importance. Several forms of regulation of technology imports and exports are examined. It is discovered that the process is insufficiently well understood to permit the design of effective regulation that, moreover, appears unlikely to eliminate inefficiency. An efficiency focus is maintained throughout since I feel no qualification to pontificate on complex and confused distributional issues.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because the market for information/knowledge about new opportunities isn't well developed, entrepreneurs and managers must build organizational capabilities inside business firms to assist in knowledge creation and knowledge capture.
“Because the market for information/ knowledge about new opportunities (Gans & Stern, 2010; Teece, 1981b) isn't well developed, entrepreneurs and managers must build organizational capabilities inside businesses firms to assist in knowledge creation and knowledge capture (Teece, 1986b, 2006b).”
From A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise (2014) · cites this paper as Teece, 1981b
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842 · see citing works
Self-citationA transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures
Hennart, J. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090406 · Cited by 1,843 · see citing works
A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise
Teece, D. J. (2014) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2013.54 · Cited by 1,300 · see citing works
Self-citationDynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions
Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2007) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-007-0010-8 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Teece, D. J.
- Corresponding author
- Teece, David J.
- ORCID
- Teece, David J.
- Venue
- The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1981-11
- Volume
- 458
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-96
- ISSN
- 0002-7162 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2122589220
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- know-how, international technology transfer, codification, transfer costs, market imperfections, multinational corporations, efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review