Cited by 43Cultural Differences and ValuesPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

Trait Psychology in the Philippines

CHURCH, A. TIMOTHY, KATIGBAK, MARCIA S.·2000·American Behavioral Scientist

Abstract

McCrae's proposal to designate a field of personality traits and culture, coupled with challenges to the trait concept by cultural psychologists, makes relevant a review of trait psychology in a collectivistic culture, the Philippines. Philippine evidence in support of the trait concept includes the following: (a) Filipinos have a rich lexicon of trait terms and use these terms to describe and understand others and their behavior, (b) traits may be an important part of Filipinos' self-concepts, (c) the structure of Filipino traits can be approximated by universal Big Five-like dimensions, (d) trait scores show criterion validity, and (e) some interjudge agreement in trait judgments can be demonstrated. There is some suggestion, however, that criterion validities and interjudge agreement values may be lower in the Philippines than in the United States, providing some support for the view that traits will be less predictive of behavior in collectivistic cultures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00027640021956107

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Predictive power can sometimes be enhanced by adding measures of culturally specific traits to measures of more general traits such as the NEO-PI-R.

    “Predictive power can sometimes be enhanced by adding measures of culturally specific traits like these to measures of more general traits, such as the NEO-PI-R (Church & Katigbak, 2000; Katigbak, Church, Guanzon-Lapena, Car- lota, & del Pilar, 2002; Zhang & Bond, 1998).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHURCH, A. T., & KATIGBAK, M. S.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Venue
American Behavioral Scientist
Published
2000-09
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
73-94
ISSN
  • 0002-7642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3381
OpenAlex
W1969722680
Cited by
43
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Behavioral Scientist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
trait psychology, personality traits, collectivist culture, Big Five personality traits, self-concept, criterion validity, interobserver agreement, cross-cultural personality, Philippines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review