The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long Distance Community in the Network Society: Contact and Support Beyond Netville
Abstract
The authors examine the experience of the residents of Netville, a suburban neighborhood with access to some of the most advanced new communication technologies available, and how this technology affected the amount of contact and support exchanged with members of their distant social networks. Focusing exclusively on friends and relatives external to the neighborhood of Netville, the authors analyze community as relations that provide a sense of belonging rather than as a group of people living near each other. Computer-mediated communication (CMC) is treated as one of several means of communication used in the maintenance of social networks. Contrary to expectations that the Internet encourages a global village, those ties that previously were just out of reach geographically experience the greatest increase in contact and support as a result of access to CMC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
Affordance, conventions, and design
Norman, D. A. (1999) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/301153.301168 · Cited by 2,040
Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet: Reconciling Conflicting Findings
NIE, N. H. (2001) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027640121957277 · Cited by 803
Cited by
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 · Cited by 2,451
Dynamics of Dyads in Social Networks: Assortative, Relational, and Proximity Mechanisms
Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743 · Cited by 939
Internet Use and Loneliness in Older Adults
Sum, S., Mathews, R. M., Hughes, I., & Campbell, A. (2008) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0010 · Cited by 384
Selfhout, M. H. W., Branje, S. J. T., Delsing, M., ter Bogt, T. F. M., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2009) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.10.011 · Cited by 375
Shor, E., Roelfs, D. J., & Yogev, T. (2013) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.08.004 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- HAMPTON, K., & WELLMAN, B.
- Venue
- American Behavioral Scientist
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 476-495
- ISSN
- 0002-7642 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3381
- OpenAlex
- W2118502987
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 62.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long Distance Community in the Network Society: Contact and Support Beyond Netville. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00027640121957303
- The paper
- HAMPTON, K., & WELLMAN, B. (2001). Long Distance Community in the Network Society: Contact and Support Beyond Netville. American Behavioral Scientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121957303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
