The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Rise of the Environmental Justice Paradigm: Injustice Framing and the Social Construction of Environmental Discourses
Abstract
This article uses social movement theory to analyze environmental justice rhetoric. It argues that the environmental justice frame is a master frame that uses discourses about injustice as an effective mobilizing tool. The article identifies an environmental justice paradigm and compares it with the new environmental paradigm. In addition, the article discusses why the environmental justice movement grew so fast and why its adherents find the environmental justice frame so appealing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
The “new environmental paradigm”
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 · Cited by 2,833
Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument
Fisher, W. R. (1984) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637758409390180 · Cited by 1,807 · cited 1×
“In short, the frame must have a high level of identity salience to potential recruits (Fisher, 1984; D. A. Snow & Benford, 1988).”
BackgroundConceptual origins, current problems, future direction
McAdam, D. (1996) · Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803987.003 · Cited by 974
Cited by
Energy justice: A conceptual review
Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., & Rehner, R. (2016) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004 · Cited by 2,116
From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice
Schlosberg, D., & Collins, L. B. (2014) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.275 · Cited by 1,374
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: Human Health and Environmental Inequalities
Brulle, R. J., & Pellow, D. N. (2006) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102124 · Cited by 1,117
Agyeman, J., Schlosberg, D., Craven, L., & Matthews, C. (2016) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090052 · Cited by 707
Embodied health movements: new approaches to social movements in health
Brown, P., Zavestoski, S., McCormick, S., Mayer, B., Morello‐Frosch, R., & Gasior Altman, R. (2004) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00378.x · Cited by 631
Metadata
- Authors
- TAYLOR, D. E.
- Venue
- American Behavioral Scientist
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 508-580
- ISSN
- 0002-7642 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3381
- OpenAlex
- W2127878251
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 44.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Rise of the Environmental Justice Paradigm: Injustice Framing and the Social Construction of Environmental Discourses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0002764200043004003
- The paper
- TAYLOR, D. E. (2000). The Rise of the Environmental Justice Paradigm: Injustice Framing and the Social Construction of Environmental Discourses. American Behavioral Scientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764200043004003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
