Who Fits the Left-Right Divide? Partisan Polarization in the American Electorate
Abstract
How has the American public responded to elite partisan polarization? Using panel data from both the Cooperative Campaign Analysis Project and the American National Election Studies, we explore the partisan consequences of the discrepancy between the one-dimensional structure of elite policy preferences and the two-dimensional structure of citizens’ policy preferences. We find that those citizens with preferences that are consistently liberal or consistently conservative across both economic and social issues have responded to elite polarization with mass polarization. However, we also find that the sizable number of citizens who hold preferences on economic and social issues that do not perfectly match the menu of options provided by elite Republicans and Democrats have not responded to elite polarization; indeed, these citizens are more likely to shift their partisan allegiance in the short-term and less likely to strengthen their party identification in the long term.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At least a bidimensional ideology distinguishing economic and social preferences is appropriate for domestic politics.
“Many political scientists and political psychologists argue for the use of at least a bidimensional ideology for domestic politics that distinguishes between economic and social preferences (Carsey and Layman, 2006;Carmines et al., 2012;Feldman and Johnston, 2014).”
From Political Ideology and Polarization: A Multi-dimensional Approach (2022) · cites this paper as Carmines et al., 2012
Cites
Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions
Bartels, L. M. (2002) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1021226224601 · Cited by 1,468 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mason, L. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12089 · Cited by 1,367 · see citing works
Wagner, M. W., & Gruszczynski, M. (2018) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699017702836 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationPolitical Ideology and Polarization: A Multi-dimensional Approach
Sinno, B., Oviedo, B., Atwell, K., Alikhani, M., & Li, J. J. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.17 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Many political scientists and political psychologists argue for the use of at least a bidimensional ideology for domestic politics that distinguishes between economic and social preferences (Carsey and Layman, 2006; Carmines et al., 2012; Feldman and Johnston, 2014).”
BackgroundThe Political Dynamics of Partisan Polarization
Schmidt, E. R., Carmines, E. G., & Sniderman, P. M. (2025) · doi:10.1017/9781009472760 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationPolarizing the middle: internet exposure and public opinion
Bryson, B. P. (2020) · International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy · doi:10.1108/ijssp-09-2019-0181 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Carmines, E. G., Ensley, M. J., & Wagner, M. W.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Kent State University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- American Behavioral Scientist
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-10-23
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1631-1653
- ISSN
- 0002-7642 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3381
- OpenAlex
- W2323231283
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 36.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Behavioral Scientist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
- Keywords
- partisan polarization, elite polarization, mass polarization, left-right divide, party identification, party realignment, American electorate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review