Cited by 110Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationMedia Influence and PoliticsAmerican Political and Social Dynamics

Who Fits the Left-Right Divide? Partisan Polarization in the American Electorate

Carmines, Edward G., Ensley, Michael J., Wagner, Michael W.·2012·American Behavioral Scientist

Abstract

How has the American public responded to elite partisan polarization? Using panel data from both the Cooperative Campaign Analysis Project and the American National Election Studies, we explore the partisan consequences of the discrepancy between the one-dimensional structure of elite policy preferences and the two-dimensional structure of citizens’ policy preferences. We find that those citizens with preferences that are consistently liberal or consistently conservative across both economic and social issues have responded to elite polarization with mass polarization. However, we also find that the sizable number of citizens who hold preferences on economic and social issues that do not perfectly match the menu of options provided by elite Republicans and Democrats have not responded to elite polarization; indeed, these citizens are more likely to shift their partisan allegiance in the short-term and less likely to strengthen their party identification in the long term.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0002764212463353

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At least a bidimensional ideology distinguishing economic and social preferences is appropriate for domestic politics.

    “Many political scientists and political psychologists argue for the use of at least a bidimensional ideology for domestic politics that distinguishes between economic and social preferences (Carsey and Layman, 2006;Carmines et al., 2012;Feldman and Johnston, 2014).”

    From Political Ideology and Polarization: A Multi-dimensional Approach (2022) · cites this paper as Carmines et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carmines, E. G., Ensley, M. J., & Wagner, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Kent State University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
American Behavioral Scientist
Published
2012-10-23
Volume
56
Issue
12
Pages
1631-1653
ISSN
  • 0002-7642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3381
OpenAlex
W2323231283
Cited by
110
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
36.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Behavioral Scientist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
Keywords
partisan polarization, elite polarization, mass polarization, left-right divide, party identification, party realignment, American electorate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review