The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Where Does Political Polarization Come From? Locating Polarization Within the U.S. Climate Change Debate
Open accessAbstract
How do we understand political polarization within the U.S. climate change debate? This article unpacks the different components of the debate to determine the source of the political divide that is so noted in the mainstream media and academic literatures. Through analysis of the content of congressional hearings on the issue of climate change, we are able to explain political polarization of the issue more fully. In particular, our results show that, contrary to representations in the mainstream media, there is increasing consensus over the science of the issue. Discussions of the type of policy instrument and the economic implications of regulating carbon dioxide emissions, however, continue to polarize opinion. This article concludes by exploring how these findings help us understand more recent political events around climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Qualitative analysis further showed that in rare instances of intergroup communication, more negative frames tended to prevail, featuring dismissal of climate change information as hoaxes, derailment of conversations to heated issues of identity, as well as overall higher levels of sarcasm and incivility [8], [17], [18].”
From Affective Polarization in Online Climate Change Discourse on Twitter (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Relying consistently on manually annotated corpora and datasets of limited size, existing scholarship has faced barriers to measuring the emotional component of climate change discussions in a generalizable fashion [8], [17], [18].”
From Affective Polarization in Online Climate Change Discourse on Twitter (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games
Putnam, R. D. (1988) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300027697 · Cited by 7,475
Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment.
Bongaarts, J. (1992) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/1971875 · Cited by 3,113
The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Oreskes, N. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1103618 · Cited by 1,814
The logic of congressional action
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-4778 · Cited by 1,802
Jstor (1993) · Cited by 1,593
Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity
Meyer, D. S., & Staggenborg, S. (1996) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230869 · Cited by 1,222
Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003 · Cited by 1,217
Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage
Boykoff, M., & Boykoff, J. (2007) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008 · Cited by 1,193
Defeating Kyoto: The Conservative Movement's Impact on U.S. Climate Change Policy
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2003) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348 · Cited by 904
A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change.
Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2008) · Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.3200/envt.50.5.26-35 · Cited by 780
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Cicerone R. J., 2001, Climate change science: An analysis of some key questions
- Fisher D. R., Climatic Change
- Kraemer R. A., 2007, Federalism and environmentalism in the United States and Germany
- Laumann E. O., 1987, The organizational state: Social change in national policy domains
- National Research Council, 2011, America’s climate choices: Panel on advancing the science of climate change
- Park H. S., Liu X., Vedlitz A. (2010). Framing climate policy debates: Science, network, and US Congress, 1976–2007 (Conference proceedings of the Policy Networks Conference 2010). Retrieved from http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/pnconfs_2010/41
- Parry M. L., 2007, Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptations, and vulnerability
- Rucker P., 2011, Washington Post
- Sheppard K., 2011, Mother Jones
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Politicization and Polarization in COVID-19 News Coverage
Hart, P. S., Chinn, S., & Soroka, S. (2020) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547020950735 · Cited by 715
Moser, S. C. (2016) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.403 · Cited by 691
Leifeld, P. (2013) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12007 · Cited by 361
Self-citationDiscourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: traditions, trends, perspectives
Leipold, S., Feindt, P. H., Winkel, G., & Keller, R. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2019.1660462 · Cited by 246
Sport Ecology: Conceptualizing an Emerging Subdiscipline Within Sport Management
McCullough, B. P., Orr, M., & Kellison, T. B. (2020) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.2019-0294 · Cited by 275
An empirical examination of echo chambers in US climate policy networks
Jasny, L., Waggle, J., & Fisher, D. R. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2666 · Cited by 227
Self-citationSandell, R., Janes, R. R., Forni, S., Crooks, J., Fontaine, D., Wajid, S., Minott, R., Wood, E., & Vlachou, M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781351251044 · Cited by 221
Social science perspectives on drivers of and responses to global climate change
Jorgenson, A. K., Fiske, S. J., Hubacek, K., Li, J., McGovern, T., Rick, T. C., Schor, J. B., SOLECKI, W. D., York, R., & Zycherman, A. (2018) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.554 · Cited by 222
Ingold, K. M., & Fischer, M. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.021 · Cited by 177
A Confirmation Bias View on Social Media Induced Polarisation During Covid-19
Modgil, S., Singh, R. K., Gupta, S., & Dennehy, D. (2021) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10222-9 · Cited by 197
Mann, M., & Schleifer, C. (2019) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soz156 · Cited by 168
Leifeld, P. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190228217.013.25 · Cited by 143
Self-citationComputer-assisted classification of contrarian claims about climate change
Coan, T., Boussalis, C., Cook, J., & Nanko, M. O. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-01714-4 · Cited by 196
Partisan Barriers to Bipartisanship
Ehret, P. J., Leaf Van Boven, A., & Sherman, D. K. (2018) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550618758709 · Cited by 132
The influence of social movements on policies that constrain fossil fuel supply
Piggot, G. (2018) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2017.1394255 · Cited by 116
The Genesis of the Birther Rumor: Partisanship, Racial Attitudes, and Political Knowledge
Jardina, A. E., & Traugott, M. W. (2018) · The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics · doi:10.1017/rep.2018.25 · Cited by 109
A changing climate of skepticism: The factors shaping climate change coverage in the US press
Schmid-Petri, H., Adam, S., Schmucki, I., & Häußler, T. (2015) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662515612276 · Cited by 120
Analyzing transitions through the lens of discourse networks: Coal phase-out in Germany
Markard, J., Rinscheid, A., & Widdel, L. (2021) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2021.08.001 · Cited by 103
Canadian news media and the cultural dynamics of multilevel climate governance
Stoddart, M. C. J., & Tindall, D. B. (2015) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1008249 · Cited by 94
Red states, green laws: Ideology and renewable energy legislation in the United States
Hess, D. J., Mai, Q. D., & Brown, K. P. (2015) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.007 · Cited by 89
Advocacy coalitions, beliefs and climate change policy in the United States
Kukkonen, A., Ylä‐Anttila, T., & Broadbent, J. P. (2017) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12321 · Cited by 88
Rinscheid, A., Pianta, S., & Weber, E. U. (2020) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.43 · Cited by 89
Diehl, T., Huber, B., de Zúñiga, H. G., & Liu, J. H.-F. (2019) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edz040 · Cited by 89
Greening the Globe: World Society and Environmental Change
Hironaka, A. (2014) · Cited by 81
Joireman, J., & Liu, R. L. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.005 · Cited by 82
Hart, P. S., & Feldman, L. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.013 · Cited by 81
Gendered discourse about climate change policies
Swim, J. K., Vescio, T. K., Dahl, J. L., & Zawadzki, S. J. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.005 · Cited by 88
Guerrero-Solé, F. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118808776 · Cited by 75
Actors in multi-sector transitions - discourse analysis on hydrogen in Germany
Ohlendorf, N., Löhr, M., & Markard, J. (2023) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2023.100692 · Cited by 71
Multistakeholder environmental governance in action: REDD+ discourse coalitions in Tanzania
Rantala, S., & Gregorio, M. D. (2014) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-06536-190266 · Cited by 66
The structure of the climate debate
Tol, R. S. J. (2017) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.005 · Cited by 64
Mobilization in the European Public Sphere: The Struggle Over Genetically Modified Organisms
Tosun, J., & Schaub, S. (2017) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12235 · Cited by 62
‘Fake News’ in Science Communication: Emotions and Strategies of Coping with Dissonance Online
Taddicken, M., & Wolff, L. (2020) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v8i1.2495 · Cited by 73
Financing the education policy discourse: philanthropic funders as entrepreneurs in policy networks
Reckhow, S., & Tompkins-Stange, M. (2018) · Interest Groups & Advocacy · doi:10.1057/s41309-018-0043-3 · Cited by 51
Mayer, A. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.020 · Cited by 49
The price of risk in residential solar investments
Petrovich, B., Carattini, S., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106856 · Cited by 47
The polycentricity of climate policy blockage
Fisher, D. R., & Leifeld, P. (2019) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02481-y · Cited by 53
Self-citationCommunity Detection in Political Discussions on Twitter
Guerrero-Solé, F. (2015) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439315617254 · Cited by 49
Billionaires in World Politics
Hägel, P. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852711.001.0001 · Cited by 43
Collaboration gaps and regional tourism networks in rural coastal communities
Stoddart, M. C. J., Catano, G., Ramos, H., Vodden, K. M., Lowery, B., & Butters, L. (2019) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2019.1694526 · Cited by 42
Shifting echo chambers in US climate policy networks
Jasny, L., Dewey, A. M., Robertson, A. G., Yagatich, W., Dubin, A. H., Waggle, J. M., & Fisher, D. R. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203463 · Cited by 41
Self-citationAffective Polarization in Online Climate Change Discourse on Twitter
Tyagi, A., Uyheng, J., & Carley, K. M. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam49781.2020.9381419 · Cited by 41
“Even if these do not necessarily translate into concrete support for policy instruments to address climate issues [12], the longterm instability of climate change skepticism points to valuable ways forward for science communication [33].”
BackgroundWe Don't Speak the Same Language: Interpreting Polarization through Machine Translation
KhudaBukhsh, A. R., Sarkar, R., Kamlet, M. S., & Mitchell, T. M. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17748 · Cited by 42
Environmental attitudes and political partisanship
DeNicola, E., & Subramaniam, P. R. (2014) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2014.03.005 · Cited by 40
Mišić, M., & Obydenkova, A. (2021) · Post-Communist Economies · doi:10.1080/14631377.2021.1943928 · Cited by 40
Extremism without extremists: Deffuant model with emotions
Sobkowicz, P. (2015) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2015.00017 · Cited by 37
Distract, delay, disrupt: examples of manufactured doubt from five industries
Goldberg, R. F., & Vandenberg, L. N. (2019) · Reviews on Environmental Health · doi:10.1515/reveh-2019-0004 · Cited by 40
Polarization of coalitions in an agent-based model of political discourse
Leifeld, P. (2014) · Computational Social Networks · doi:10.1186/s40649-014-0007-y · Cited by 38
Self-citationDevelopment and validation of the anthropogenic climate change dissenter inventory
Bentley, A. P. K., Petcovic, H. L., & Cassidy, D. P. (2016) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1250150 · Cited by 38
Trust, tribalism and tweets: has political polarization made science a “wedge issue”?
Helmuth, B. S. T., Gouhier, T. C., Scyphers, S. B., & Mocarski, J. (2016) · Climate Change Responses · doi:10.1186/s40665-016-0018-z · Cited by 37
Advances in Qualitative Methods in Environmental Research
Caggiano, H., & Weber, E. U. (2023) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-080106 · Cited by 60
Longo, S. B., & Baker, J. O. (2014) · Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/tsq.12052 · Cited by 37
Agri‐food technology politics: Exploring policy narratives in the European Parliament
Vogeler, C. S., Schwindenhammer, S., Gonglach, D., & Bandelow, N. C. (2021) · European Policy Analysis · doi:10.1002/epa2.1114 · Cited by 36
Kammerer, M., & Ingold, K. M. (2021) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2021.08.005 · Cited by 35
Climate denial in Canada and the United States
Boulianne, S., & Belland, S. (2022) · Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie · doi:10.1111/cars.12388 · Cited by 43
Influence of policy discourse networks on local energy transitions
Brugger, H. I., & Henry, A. D. (2021) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2021.03.006 · Cited by 43
Adam, S., Reber, U., Häußler, T., & Schmid-Petri, H. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240089 · Cited by 34
Morey, B. N., García, S. J., Nieri, T. A., Bruckner, T. A., & Link, B. G. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114417 · Cited by 32
Narratives and the Policy Process : Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework
Shanahan, E. A. (2021) · Montana State University ScholarWorks (Montana State University) · doi:10.15788/npf · Cited by 33
Liu, X., Vedlitz, A., Stoutenborough, J. W., & Robinson, S. E. (2015) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1390-6 · Cited by 31
Policy Analysis of Instrument Design: How Policy Design Affects Policy Constituency
Curley, C., Feiock, R. C., & Xu, C. K. (2020) · Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/13876988.2020.1749517 · Cited by 32
Comparing Discourse and Policy Network Approaches: Evidence from Water Policy on Micropollutants
Schaub, S., & Metz, F. (2020) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v8i2.2597 · Cited by 35
Social futures of global climate change: A structural phenomenology
Hall, J. R. (2015) · American Journal of Cultural Sociology · doi:10.1057/ajcs.2015.12 · Cited by 30
The Science–Policy Interface as a Discourse Network: Finland’s Climate Change Policy 2002–2015
Kukkonen, A., & Ylä‐Anttila, T. (2020) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v8i2.2603 · Cited by 30
Discourse coalitions in Swiss waste management: gridlock or winds of change?
Duygan, M., Stauffacher, M., & Meylan, G. (2017) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.006 · Cited by 29
Wang, Y. (2017) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.25.2757 · Cited by 25
Howe, A. C., Tindall, D. B., & Stoddart, M. C. J. (2021) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2021.06.004 · Cited by 25
Hart, P. S., & Feldman, L. (2020) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547020980443 · Cited by 31
Hornsey, M. J., Fielding, K. S., McStay, R., Reser, J., & Bradley, G. L. (2015) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916515574085 · Cited by 27
Framing brain drain: between solidarity and skills in European labor mobility
Hasselbalch, J. (2019) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1626755 · Cited by 24
Stewardship mapping and assessment project
Svendsen, E. S., Campbell, L. K., Fisher, D. R., Connolly, J. J., Johnson, M. L., Sonti, N. F., Locke, D. H., Westphal, L. M., Fisher, C. L., Grove, J. M., et al. (2019) · doi:10.2737/nrs-gtr-156 · Cited by 24
Self-citationBusch, K. C. (2021) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2021.1960954 · Cited by 25
Tindall, D. B., Stoddart, M. C. J., & Howe, A. C. (2020) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2020.1783730 · Cited by 20
Take Action Now: Motivational Framing and Action Requests in Climate Advocacy
Hestres, L. E. (2018) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1424010 · Cited by 21
Shifting governance cooperatively – coordination by public discourses in the German water-food nexus
Vogeler, C. S., Möck, M., & Bandelow, N. C. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112266 · Cited by 21
Tyagi, A., Uyheng, J., & Carley, K. M. (2021) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-021-00792-6 · Cited by 27
Motta, M. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780197788844.001.0001 · Cited by 26
Mental models of a water management system in a green building
Kalantzis, A., Thatcher, A., & Sheridan, C. M. (2016) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.04.007 · Cited by 21
Discourse Network of a Public Issue Debate: A Study on Covid-19 Cases in Indonesia
Indonesia, U., Eriyanto, E., Ali, D. J., & Indonesian Survey Circle, I. (2020) · Jurnal Komunikasi Malaysian Journal of Communication · doi:10.17576/jkmjc-2020-3603-13 · Cited by 20
Leifeld, P. (2018) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.109 · Cited by 21
Self-citationCommunicating Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Efforts in American Cities
Boussalis, C., Coan, T., & Holman, M. R. (2019) · Climate · doi:10.3390/cli7030045 · Cited by 19
Weerasooriya, T. C., Dutta, S., Ranasinghe, T., Zampieri, M., Homan, C. M., & KhudaBukhsh, A. R. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.713 · Cited by 27
Echo chambers and false certainty
Farrell, J. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2732 · Cited by 18
Gatekeeping the Plenary Floor: Discourse Network Analysis as a Novel Approach to Party Control
Bhattacharya, C. (2020) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v8i2.2611 · Cited by 17
Deluty, S. B., Scott, D. M., Waugh, S. C., Martin, V. K., McCaw, K. A., Rupert, J. R., Webb, T. L., Baumgarn, S. A., Carpenter, M. J., & Duncan, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.622199 · Cited by 19
Hartley, K., & Kuecker, G. D. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009127868 · Cited by 16
Building Consensus: Idea Brokerage in Teacher Policy Networks
Galey-Horn, S., Reckhow, S., Ferrare, J. J., & Jasny, L. (2019) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831219872738 · Cited by 19
Kennedy, E. H., & Muzzerall, P. (2021) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642211056258 · Cited by 19
Navigating Russia's war and energy transition: Poland's coal challenge
Černoch, F., Lehotský, L., & Konvalinová, A. (2024) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103548 · Cited by 16
Bossner, F., & Nagel, M. (2020) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v8i2.2573 · Cited by 15
Malin, S. A., Mayer, A., Crooks, J., McKenzie, L. M., Peel, J. L., & Adgate, J. L. (2019) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.049 · Cited by 20
Pandemics and Politics: Analyzing the politicization and polarization of pandemic-related reporting
Schmidt, H. C. (2022) · Newspaper Research Journal · doi:10.1177/07395329221095850 · Cited by 14
Lintner, T., Diviák, T., Nekardová, B., Lehotský, L., & Vašečka, M. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02276-8 · Cited by 12
Powell, W. A., Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-4558-4.ch003 · Cited by 12
The F-campaign: a discourse network analysis of party leaders’ campaign statements on Facebook
Steinfeld, N. (2016) · Israel Affairs · doi:10.1080/13537121.2016.1174385 · Cited by 12
Partisan Cueing and Polarization in Public Opinion About Climate Change
Guber, D. L. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.306 · Cited by 16
Hofman, A., & Aalbers, M. B. (2017) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12309 · Cited by 11
Major Media Outlets and Climate Change Action: Comparing US Media Coverage of the Green New Deal
Bhatti, S. J., Jones, B., Uppalapati, S. S., & Kristiansen, S. (2021) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2021.1995457 · Cited by 11
Häußler, T., Schmid-Petri, H., Adam, S., Reber, U., & Arlt, D. (2016) · Studies in Communication Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.scoms.2016.04.002 · Cited by 12
Media and partisanship in energy transition: Towards a new synthesis
Mayer, A., & Parks, P. (2023) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103368 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, D. R., Waggle, J., & Leifeld, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- American Behavioral Scientist
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-11-02
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-92
- ISSN
- 0002-7642 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3381
- OpenAlex
- W2018045098
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 25.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.dora.lib4ri.ch
- Locations
- American Behavioral Scientist (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
- DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0826892)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- political polarization, climate change debate, congressional hearings, policy instruments, mainstream media coverage, United States climate policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
