Genetic Epistemology
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Historically, the fundamental theory that accounts for the role of educational robots is constructivism.
“Historically, the fundamental theory that accounts for the role of educational robots is constructivism (Bruner, 1997;Ginsburg, 1988;Piaget, 1970).”
From A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics (2019) · cites this paper as Piaget, 1970
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics
Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019) · Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) · doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1223 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Lee, Y.-F., Hwang, G.-J., & Chen, P.-Y. (2022) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10142-8 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
- Authors
- Piaget, J., & Duckworth, E.
- Venue
- American Behavioral Scientist
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1970-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 459-480
- ISSN
- 0002-7642 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3381
- OpenAlex
- W4248976610
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 19.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Behavioral Scientist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- genetic epistemology, epistemology, knowledge acquisition, cognitive development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
