Cited by 323Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningAI in Service Interactions

Impacts of an AI-based chabot on College students' after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation

Lee, Yen-Fen, Hwang, Gwo-Jen, Chen, Pei-Ying·2022·Educational Technology Research and Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11423-022-10142-8

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, Y.-F., Hwang, G.-J., & Chen, P.-Y.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Hwang, Gwo-Jen
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
2022-08-01
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
1843-1865
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W4289260799
Cited by
323
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 29
FWCI
56.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST-109-2511-H-011-002-MY3)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
AI chatbots, student self-regulation, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, student motivation, public health education, immediate feedback, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review