Cited by 738

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999

Moody, James·2004·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Has sociology become more socially integrated over the last 30 years? Recent work in the sociology of knowledge demonstrates a direct linkage between social interaction patterns and the structure of ideas, suggesting that scientific collaboration networks affect scientific practice. I test three competing models for sociological collaboration networks and find that a structurally cohesive core that has been growing steadily since the early 1960s characterizes the discipline's coauthorship network. The results show that participation in the sociology collaboration network depends on research specialty and that quantitative work is more likely to be coauthored than non-quantitative work. However, structural embeddedness within the network core given collaboration is largely unrelated to specialty area. This pattern is consistent with a loosely overlapping specialty structure that has potentially integrative implications for theoretical development in sociology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000312240406900204

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. 10.2307/2654383 · DOI
  2. Abbott Andrew., 2001, Chaos of Disciplines
  3. 10.2307/2095162 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s12108-999-1007-5 · DOI
  5. Bearman Peter., 1993, Relations into Rhetorics: Local Elite Social Structure in Norfolk, England: 1540–1640
  6. 10.1086/228631 · DOI
  7. 10.1086/228667 · DOI
  8. 10.2307/2096210 · DOI
  9. Cole Jonathan R., 1973, Social Stratification in Science
  10. 10.1086/210040 · DOI
  11. Collins Randall., 2001, What's Wrong With Sociology, 62
  12. 10.1086/228424 · DOI
  13. 10.2307/2654382 · DOI
  14. Crane Diana., 1972, Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities
  15. Crane Diana, 1992, Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization, 197
  16. 10.1007/s12108-001-1029-0 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/2093295 · DOI
  18. Davis James A., 2001, What's Wrong With Sociology?, 99
  19. Davis James A., 1972, Sociological Theories in Progress, 2, 218
  20. 10.1007/978-1-349-17729-5 · DOI
  21. Endersby J. W., 1996, Social Science Quarterly, 77, 375
  22. 10.2307/2096209 · DOI
  23. Fisher Bonnie S., 1998, Political Science Online, 847
  24. 10.1017/CBO9780511527524 · DOI
  25. 10.1086/341744 · DOI
  26. Hagstrom Warren O., 1965, The Scientific Community
  27. Harary Frank, 1965, Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs
  28. Hargens Lowell., 1975, Patterns of Scientific Research
  29. 10.1177/104649647100200201 · DOI
  30. 10.1257/jep.10.3.153 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/423605a · DOI
  32. Kuhn Thomas., 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
  33. 10.1086/262132 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/2095896 · DOI
  35. 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141122 · DOI
  36. Mannheim Karl., 1936, Ideology and Utopia
  37. Markovsky Barry., 1998, The Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models, 343
  38. 10.1086/343192 · DOI
  39. 10.2307/1924423 · DOI
  40. Milgram S., 1969, Psychology Today, 22, 61
  41. 10.1086/338954 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/000312240306800105 · DOI
  43. Newman M. E. J., 2000, Models of the Small World
  44. 10.1073/pnas.98.2.404 · DOI
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.026118 · DOI
  46. 10.1177/000312240106600306 · DOI
  47. Palmer Edger N., 1985, Graphical Evolution: An Introduction to the Theory of Random Graphs
  48. 10.2307/3090139 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1007/BF02025829 · DOI
  50. Simmel Georg., 1950, The Sociology of Georg Simmel
  51. Simpson Ida H., 2001, What's Wrong With Sociology, 271
  52. Skvoretz John., 1998, What is Social Theory? The Philosophical Debates, 238
  53. 10.1007/BF01476366 · DOI
  54. 10.1146/annurev.so.20.080194.001513 · DOI
  55. 10.1086/210318 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1038/30918 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1111/0081-1750.00098 · DOI
  58. White Douglas R., 2002, Análisis de Redes: Aplicaciones en Ciencias Sociales, 41
  59. Zuckerman Harriet., 1977, Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in The United States
  60. Zuckerman Harriet, 1973, The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, 497

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 738

Metadata

Authors
Moody, J.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
2004-04
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
213-238
ISSN
  • 0003-1224
  • 1939-8271
Cited by
738
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review