The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Intellectual and Social Organization Of the Sciences
Abstract
In a rapidly changing and inter-disciplinary world it is important to understand the nature and generation of knowledge, and its social organization. Increasing attention is paid in the social sciences and management studies to the constitution and claims of different theories, perspectives, and 'paradigms'. This book is one of the most respected and robust analyses of these issues. For this new paperback edition Richard Whitley - a leading figure in European business education - has written a new introduction which addresses the particular epistemological issues presented by management and business studies. He approaches the sciences as differently organized systems for the production and validation of knowledge - systems which become established in particular contexts and which generate different sorts of knowledge. He identifies seven major types of scientific field and discusses the establishment and growth of these sciences, including the major consequences of the nineteenth-century expansion of employment opportunities for researchers; the competitive pursuit of public reputations; and the domination of intellectual work by employees. He also examines the divergences in the way research is organized and controlled both in different fields, and in the same field within different historical circumstances. This book will be of interest to all graduate students concerned with the social study of knowledge, science, technology, and the history and philosophy of science.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The framework has been championed by influential researchers at prestigious institutions, whose intellectual authority lends credibility and accelerates its diffusion through influential scientific networks (Whitley 2000).”
From The myth of the Bayesian brain (2025) · cites this paper as Whitley 2000
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Knowledge for Theory and Practice
de Ven, A. H. V., & Johnson, P. E. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.22527385 · Cited by 1,649
Developing design propositions through research synthesis
Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & van Aken, J. E. (2008) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607088020 · Cited by 1,057
The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999
Moody, J. (2004) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240406900204 · Cited by 738
What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field
Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C., & Chen, M. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.615 · Cited by 835
Metadata
- Authors
- Whitley, R.
- Corresponding author
- Whitley, Richard
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2000-06-29
- OpenAlex
- W4388150685
- Cited by
- 1,076
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 47
- FWCI
- 28.11
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- social organization of science, business education, scientific paradigms, history of science, philosophy of science, research organization, knowledge production, scientific reputation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review