The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kin Support among Blacks and Whites: Race and Family Organization
Abstract
This article addresses two central debates in the scholarship on black families: the disorganization versus superorganization debate and the culture versus structure debate. Focusing on kin support as a measure of family integration and using the National Survey of Families and Households (1992-1994), this article challenges the assumptions about black and white families in both debates. It shows that blacks and whites have different patterns of kin support involvement. Whereas blacks are more involved in practical support (help with transportation, household work, and child care), whites report greater involvement in financial and emotional kin support. This article also shows that gender is crucial for understanding racial differences. Black men and white men are very much alike, whereas there are many significant differences between black women and white women. Furthermore, in understanding kin support, diversity within racial groups appears to matter more than race itself. Social structure explains most of the racial differences in kin support, though cultural differences between whites and blacks do exist and help to explain kin support.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Sahlins, M., & Graeber, D. (2017) · Routledge (orig. 1972) · doi:10.4324/9781315184951 · Cited by 3,159
Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: an example of formal theory construction.
Bengtson, V. L., & Roberts, R. E. L. (1991) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352993 · Cited by 1,358
Structural Determinants of Men's and Women's Personal Networks
Moore, G. (1990) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095868 · Cited by 930
Strong And Large Black Women?: Exploring Relationships between Deviant Womanhood and Weight
Beauboeuf-Lafontant, T. (2003) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243202238981 · Cited by 157
Hatch, L. R. (1991) · Research on Aging · doi:10.1177/0164027591132003 · Cited by 97
Cited by
Swartz, T. T. (2009) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134615 · Cited by 448
Gender, Work Time, and Care Responsibilities Among Faculty 1
Misra, J., Lundquist, J. H., & Templer, A. (2012) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01319.x · Cited by 332
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2013) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_25 · Cited by 269
Financially Fragile Households: Evidence and Implications
Lusardi, A., Schneider, D., & Tufano, P. (2011) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.1353/eca.2011.0002 · Cited by 258
Integrated Motherhood: Beyond Hegemonic Ideologies of Motherhood
Dow, D. M. (2016) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/jomf.12264 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarkisian, N., & Gerstel, N.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 812-837
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W1969222465
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 25.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kin Support among Blacks and Whites: Race and Family Organization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000312240406900604
- The paper
- Sarkisian, N., & Gerstel, N. (2004). Kin Support among Blacks and Whites: Race and Family Organization. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900604
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.